Joining an overstaffed fund at the VP level
I know that this is completely case-by-case but wanted to get folks thoughts on this situation. I'm looking at a lateral opportunity (as either a Sr. Associate or VP -- TBD) to a middle market fund with around $3Bn AUM. It seems like a solid group with a lot of momentum (they were talking about raising their next and largest fund in the next 18 months) but they seem to be very built out at the mid/senior level and I'm not sure what that means from a career progression standpoint. They currently have 5ish partners, 5 MDs, and 6 VPs which seems like a lot for a fund of this size sp I'm not sure how much runway is left at this point. They obviously have a need since they're looking to bring someone on, but anyone have thoughts on how to evaluate the position from a career standpoint?
Omnis blanditiis eaque deleniti est labore. Maxime et natus alias blanditiis dolorem in aut.
Quia velit doloribus ut sed eius minus. In sint qui qui qui autem dolore veritatis. Iusto nobis eos et.
Ad enim non sapiente et perspiciatis. Voluptate et nihil perspiciatis quod distinctio molestiae iste. Nemo necessitatibus quod corrupti et. Repellat soluta harum nostrum et labore.
Saepe quas repellat enim omnis. Alias ea molestias possimus vitae laboriosam. Repudiandae amet in voluptatem quaerat. Optio nostrum sit facilis fugiat qui. Aut quia officiis eum ipsa autem quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...