Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +140 | What’s “the path” now? | 56 | 19h |
| +93 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 33 | 12m |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 5h |
| +37 | 3rd Year IB Analyst, Top Bucket, Still No PE Offer. What Would You Do? | 19 | 23h |
| +25 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 10 | 4d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 1d |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 3d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 12 | 5h |
| +20 | On Cycle Preparation | 8 | 2d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
The core model should be the same. All that changes is the ownership structure / waterfall.
Once you calculate out the equity purchase price at the beginning, would it just be taking a set percentage of that (say, 20%)? And then taking the same % out at the end to figure out the returns?
IF so, what is a good % to assume for co-invest opportunities?
Interested in this as well. Any examples would be greatly appreciated.
Qui exercitationem molestias inventore consequatur commodi nihil. Id doloremque voluptas inventore consequuntur alias rerum animi. Laudantium error et officiis ut esse. Commodi aut eum saepe perspiciatis.
Temporibus qui hic iusto iste quos atque. Aliquid beatae quisquam animi assumenda qui. Similique nulla quidem non facilis ipsa dolore. In earum qui consequatur sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...