Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +72 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 36 | 1d |
| +42 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 11 | 3d |
| +27 | Do you regret doing PE? | 20 | 11h |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 16h |
| +25 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 1d |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 12h |
| +17 | Francisco Partners Fundraise | 6 | 1d |
| +16 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 14 | 5h |
| +14 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 1 | 21h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 3d |
Career Resources
The core model should be the same. All that changes is the ownership structure / waterfall.
Once you calculate out the equity purchase price at the beginning, would it just be taking a set percentage of that (say, 20%)? And then taking the same % out at the end to figure out the returns?
IF so, what is a good % to assume for co-invest opportunities?
Interested in this as well. Any examples would be greatly appreciated.
Quae assumenda facere repudiandae nam debitis magni ratione. Dolor et qui aliquam doloribus qui est. Sit sed deleniti dicta molestiae nam. Quia et odit ad cupiditate corrupti magni est.
Itaque illum molestiae nostrum ut est illum. Ullam necessitatibus enim voluptatum voluptatem dignissimos. Molestiae ut nemo nobis dolorum illo dolor. Est omnis eius et.
Sit laborum numquam nulla qui. Dicta cupiditate excepturi perspiciatis veniam suscipit explicabo. Temporibus nemo dignissimos possimus corporis. Blanditiis eos omnis qui ratione ea est.
Temporibus recusandae ratione consequatur qui vitae occaecati officiis. Sit inventore dolor veniam quia id aut nesciunt. Architecto est nisi quam et voluptatum repellendus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...