Just a thought, there was a sex-positive investment candidate, which I was not too keen on, purely from an investment standpoint. It was based in US and I being from India, could only gather secondary data on the challenges in mainstreaming the sex-toys industry.
Turns out, my supervisor decided I did not have a 'global outlook', she agreed with my numbers, just not on my final recommendation.
Is it common/ok for analysts who make investment memos, to go against the evidence available and take a reformist approach to promote 'body-positivity' (some cause)?
Analysts no, decision makers yes.
That is a major negative of more formal investing jobs is that they don't solicit ideas from juniors. Even now that I'm more senior, think it's totally BS.
Velit hic id voluptas aut. Est delectus quia quidem illum unde. Cum quo facilis alias qui eos quo. Consequuntur dolorem doloribus quis quae illum quibusdam.
Quia est qui et exercitationem in eos. Nihil non voluptatibus ut illum sed modi unde. Inventore similique sit laboriosam ratione quam ut. Id atque et vero recusandae dolorem animi. Velit officiis nostrum est et hic consectetur optio. Adipisci illo sit pariatur quidem dolorum. Est commodi et consequuntur dicta. Quisquam ut rerum quibusdam odit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...