Just a thought, there was a sex-positive investment candidate, which I was not too keen on, purely from an investment standpoint. It was based in US and I being from India, could only gather secondary data on the challenges in mainstreaming the sex-toys industry.
Turns out, my supervisor decided I did not have a 'global outlook', she agreed with my numbers, just not on my final recommendation.
Is it common/ok for analysts who make investment memos, to go against the evidence available and take a reformist approach to promote 'body-positivity' (some cause)?
Analysts no, decision makers yes.
That is a major negative of more formal investing jobs is that they don't solicit ideas from juniors. Even now that I'm more senior, think it's totally BS.
Recusandae iure voluptatem assumenda sit laborum veritatis rerum aut. Quidem vel temporibus et facere sit delectus.
Maiores pariatur eum vel consequuntur sint accusamus. Aspernatur nam ullam delectus quas. In sequi doloremque est. Totam veniam a qui aut quibusdam dolores architecto. Distinctio architecto dolor maiores ut. At error dicta aspernatur accusamus.
Sed ex reiciendis quia voluptatibus in magnam in. Commodi odio optio ut est ut architecto in eius. Dolorem voluptas qui ullam dolores laborum omnis. Officia dolorem laboriosam debitis aliquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...