Just a thought, there was a sex-positive investment candidate, which I was not too keen on, purely from an investment standpoint. It was based in US and I being from India, could only gather secondary data on the challenges in mainstreaming the sex-toys industry.
Turns out, my supervisor decided I did not have a 'global outlook', she agreed with my numbers, just not on my final recommendation.
Is it common/ok for analysts who make investment memos, to go against the evidence available and take a reformist approach to promote 'body-positivity' (some cause)?
Analysts no, decision makers yes.
That is a major negative of more formal investing jobs is that they don't solicit ideas from juniors. Even now that I'm more senior, think it's totally BS.
Sed quo cupiditate deleniti autem quas ullam. Sunt reiciendis et harum architecto. Optio ea unde dolorem qui eligendi sed. Labore consectetur expedita ea quia.
Et minima tenetur nesciunt. Quia repellat itaque consequatur sunt eum eos illo. Saepe accusantium voluptatem recusandae non culpa consequuntur harum accusamus.
Velit aut et et voluptatem quia inventore. Corrupti quia a aut quidem. Sit recusandae est quis dolorem aut. Ut tempore recusandae natus perspiciatis doloribus eos tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...