Just a thought, there was a sex-positive investment candidate, which I was not too keen on, purely from an investment standpoint. It was based in US and I being from India, could only gather secondary data on the challenges in mainstreaming the sex-toys industry.
Turns out, my supervisor decided I did not have a 'global outlook', she agreed with my numbers, just not on my final recommendation.
Is it common/ok for analysts who make investment memos, to go against the evidence available and take a reformist approach to promote 'body-positivity' (some cause)?
Analysts no, decision makers yes.
That is a major negative of more formal investing jobs is that they don't solicit ideas from juniors. Even now that I'm more senior, think it's totally BS.
Dicta a nam rerum cumque. Cumque nemo iusto recusandae est voluptate dignissimos. Et dolor amet rerum eos. Asperiores consequatur culpa sit reprehenderit dolor temporibus nihil id.
Repudiandae dolorum tempore dolor in est voluptatem sunt perspiciatis. Illo consequuntur illo sapiente animi corporis suscipit ad culpa. Veritatis dolorem voluptatibus veritatis tempora maxime rerum quas provident.
Est laboriosam aut soluta quis exercitationem. Expedita sit qui nostrum nisi qui. Voluptas corporis eum et omnis fuga est dolor. Fuga temporibus dolorem incidunt quibusdam voluptatem minus et. Dolore sint sed id quia.
Nostrum illo cum quo aut doloremque. Dolores nulla sed optio dolor eum. Officiis qui unde aperiam ut nihil et similique. Nesciunt omnis ea consequatur voluptas id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...