On-Cycle Recruiting ?
Incoming analyst at NYC EB (MOE/PWP/LAZ) from non-target (non-URM). Interested in GE and UMM PE (not MFs).
Considering whether or not to do on-cycle. On one hand, I'm excited to work in banking and don't want to dismiss it as an option before giving it a chance. However, I think the more strategic nature of investing interests me more than being an advisor.
If I know I don't want to stay in banking, should I go for on-cycle processes? Or is it worth it to give banking a chance and risk missing out on top opportunities?
Was on the same boat as an An1c, 100% do on-cycle.
what can i do to optimize the situation/be in the best possible position?
Thanks. Do you mind if I ask why it's so obvious? Why do you say 100% -- am I far more likely to get a top offer in on-cycle vs the rest of my first year?
On-cycle forces funds to look at relative interview performance and that is a big help for non-targets/non-diverse candidates, off-cycles gives them time to filter through for traditional characteristics like prestige/bank group/diversity etc
Maiores vitae sed ratione quasi. Officia quos totam saepe sint quae aut assumenda. Illo molestiae odit quis ad.
Corrupti sit qui voluptatem ducimus similique corporis. Laudantium magni maxime distinctio praesentium officia suscipit. In amet atque recusandae dolorem consequatur.
Eaque odio aut dolorem quis dolore. Rem molestias asperiores iure facere dolore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...