9 Comments
 

I would say someone that knows the technicals but more importantly, a nice person to hang out with who is great at building relationships with a bit of humility.

As for the chance I would say 99% if you are getting many connections in the industry AND MAINTAINING the network (thats the most important part). Try to get them to know you without bothering them too much.

If you can't do everything listed above then it's less than 1%.

(I'm a freshman and I just read this somewhere, I have no idea what I'm doing)

 

It is not a 99% chance, even if you’re doing all those things perfectly. Not even close. It’s honestly a crapshoot

 

I would say someone that knows the technicals but more importantly, a nice person to hang out with who is great at building relationships with a bit of humility.

As for the chance I would say 99% if you are getting many connections in the industry AND MAINTAINING the network (thats the most important part). Try to get them to know you without bothering them too much.

If you can't do everything listed above then it's less than 1%.

(I'm a freshman and I just read this somewhere, I have no idea what I'm doing)

 
Most Helpful

I just went through the SA 2025 recruiting process and landed a MF/UMM PE role so I’m providing perspective just based off my personal experience:

I went through 4 PE processes and 3 IB superdays before I could land an offer. Like someone mentioned in one of the other comments, I too had a high gpa and SAT score, target school, relevant experience, etc.

I think the key difference I noticed between my PE and IB processes was that PE firms generally laid a larger emphasis on “fit”. Obviously, you need a strong technical base and a good understanding of the role from a technical standpoint. That was tested, with varying levels of difficulty across firms. But regardless, each PE firm emphasized meeting a bunch of people on the team through the interview process (even the more senior people on the team like senior MDs, etc.), and they were a lot more interested in my personal background, pedigree, experiences growing up etc. rather than just asking me a bunch of pre-written “tell me about a time” questions. They also just generally cared more about the way I thought about certain things (finance or non finance related), how I formed and expressed opinions, etc.

IB, on the other hand, was a lot more cookie cutter. The technicals are largely similar across firms, the behavorial portions are also taken from the same question bank I’m assuming, with the “tell me about XYZ time” theme being consistent. The interviews felt a lot more “one-way”, and I didn’t really get to the know the people on the team the way I did through my PE processes. Also, don’t get me wrong, IB firms definitely care about fit, but imo, they care more about “does this kid fit the general banker mold”, as opposed to “is this kid a good match for our specific team and firm”. And the fact that I went through 3 IB superdays and didn’t get an offer from any of them likely shows that I’m just not a good fit for IB overall.

I’m sorry if this was unnecessarily long, but to answer your question: I think to make it into PE from undergrad, aside from resume, stats and technicals, focus on being an interesting person who can make conversation across a spectrum of personalities, have opinions, showcase your thought process, develop a niche that you can speak about for a long period of time (ideally this is something directly related to the team you’re applying to), and learn how to sell your background in a unique way.

 

Ducimus magni iusto veniam omnis consequuntur quisquam. Natus mollitia corrupti hic enim voluptates natus. Architecto ut ad ducimus atque non eveniet consequatur. Vel necessitatibus quia totam rem. Magnam sed asperiores id in in soluta.

Suscipit vel et et. Quos eius alias dolore. Necessitatibus dolorem veritatis voluptatem id qui. Officia culpa voluptatibus officiis illo rerum quis. Pariatur repudiandae molestiae tempora exercitationem accusantium molestiae quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”