PE->Strat Fin -> Back to investing?

My background is I have 3 years of banking, 2 years of PE and 1 yr of strat fin (PE portco). I've been trying to get back into an investing seat (from early stage to buyout) but it's been tough & probably impossible near term.

I have several options right now:

a) back to software banking (sponsor coverage / sell-sides / buy-sidesare main mandate) -> path of least resistance
b) corp dev / strat fin -> seat at pre-IPO software company with 50/50 mix of corp dev / strat fin 

If my long term career goal is to still trying get back into some sort of investing seat ( IK PE will be nearly impossible) whether that's growth or VC, which path would you recommend? Thanks

2 Comments
 

If your long-term goal is to return to an investing seat, here's how the options stack up based on the most helpful WSO content:

Option A: Back to Software Banking

  • Pros:
    • Banking roles, especially in sponsor coverage or sell-side mandates, keep you close to deal flow and financial modeling, which are highly transferable skills for growth equity or VC roles.
    • Strong networking opportunities with PE, VC, and growth equity firms through deal interactions.
    • Banking is a well-trodden path for transitioning into investing roles, and your prior experience in PE adds credibility.
  • Cons:
    • Banking hours can be grueling, and it may not align with your long-term goal of moving back into investing.
    • It’s a step back from your current strategic finance role, which might feel like a lateral or backward move.

Option B: Corp Dev/Strat Fin at a Pre-IPO Software Company

  • Pros:
    • Working at a pre-IPO company gives you exposure to growth-stage businesses, which aligns well with VC or growth equity investing.
    • Corp dev roles often involve M&A and strategic initiatives, which are directly relevant to investing.
    • You’ll gain operational insights, which are increasingly valued in growth equity and VC roles.
    • If the company goes public or has a successful exit, it could boost your resume and network.
  • Cons:
    • Corp dev/strat fin roles may not provide as much direct exposure to deal flow as banking.
    • Networking opportunities with investors might be more limited compared to banking.

Recommendation

If your ultimate goal is to return to an investing seat, Option B (Corp Dev/Strat Fin) is likely the better choice. Here’s why: - It aligns more closely with the growth equity and VC world, where operational experience and understanding of scaling businesses are highly valued. - You’ll still have opportunities to network with investors, especially if the company is pre-IPO and engaging with VCs or growth equity firms. - It positions you as someone with both investing and operational experience, which can differentiate you in a competitive market.

However, if you feel your network is not strong enough to facilitate a move back into investing, Option A (Banking) could be a better short-term play to rebuild those connections. Ultimately, your ability to network and leverage relationships will be the key to transitioning back into an investing role.

Sources: Corporate Strategy vs Corporate Development, Most academic style of investing that requires the most thought?, Life after 2 years in Private Equity, From PE >> Startup >> Back to PE, Any career regrets after moving from PE to public markets?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Error temporibus quia adipisci molestiae ex et tempore. Cumque iste ut consequatur. Cum quia harum eligendi consequatur in ut tenetur aut. Omnis ea sunt deleniti est autem molestiae eos cupiditate. Aut facilis ducimus et debitis quis dolores est voluptatem.

Porro rerum quod est libero. Voluptatum eos veniam deleniti reiciendis in sed vel accusantium. Unde cupiditate voluptatem nulla iure aspernatur dolorem excepturi vitae. Et tempore voluptas at recusandae.

In perspiciatis sequi adipisci libero. Facere in deserunt laudantium occaecati ut. Totam tenetur facilis blanditiis nisi. Rerum ad voluptatem optio in velit cumque. Laborum dignissimos reprehenderit velit porro non sint.

Illum ex explicabo fugit illo eum. Quia in natus qui numquam dolorem voluptatem. Quo quis at quas aut. Magni error incidunt corrupti quo eum ipsa. Ipsum accusantium nobis fuga repellat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”