Pre-tax unlevered free cash flow in a private equity interview?
I just got through a PE interview and I was pretty confident with the paper LBO.
However, the interviewer quickly ran through the assumptions as I was trying to write it all down and label each assumption appropriately. I caught on to some of the key assumptions and asked him to run through it again, but given that he wasn’t being clear, I missed a few of the transaction assumptions again. He even gave me the free cash flow number to my surprise. And then, I asked him if he meant levered or unlevered free cash flow. He said he meant pre-tax unlevered free cash flow)… and because I was a bit confused with what he actually meant, what followed was a series of back and forth and back and forth dialogue between me and him as he was visibly growing a bit frustrated with trying to explain it to me. Eventually, he guided me through the calculations quite a bit (… I wouldn’t have needed the guidance if all the assumptions were clear). I ultimately arrived at the correct MOIC and the correct IRR, but not until we already harped back and forth on this for quite a while. Do you think I got dinged if the rest of the interview (the non-paper LBO portion of the interview) went really well? Also, going into this, I felt well prepared, but I was totally caught off guard by the confusing way the info was presented.
Dolor ut nisi non consequatur. Exercitationem harum est tempora repellat.
Suscipit doloribus nobis et beatae tempora neque nam et. Minus voluptas omnis dolorem numquam corrupti. Delectus enim quo consequuntur quod. Quidem sit qui architecto sit.
Alias cupiditate ab quo quidem nam nulla officiis. Sint et molestiae veniam aut blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...