Quick Question on a PE transaction

Hello, my first post here. I am working on a model provided by a PE Firm there they purchase majority share of a company valued at $60MM (10x multiple of EBITDA) for $55MM with $5MM rolled over by the management. However, in the Post Close PF Balance Sheet, the equity injection is only $45MM, with the remaining $15MM as it per the previous FYE. I m a little confused about them not puttin gin the entire $60MM.

I asked the PE Firm and they stated its purchase accounting. So, for modelling purposes, since the injection is $45MM, $5MM roll over from the owner, and the rest is attributed to Assets as part of purchase accounting, correct? In reality, they would have paid $55MM to the current ownership that are selling their stake hence the total Asset side = $60MM whcih is the Enterprise Value?

Does this make sense?

Thank you.

Sal

5 Comments
 

so the equation A=L+E ties to $60MM. on the Asset side, theres GW of $45MM, rest in PP&E and A/R, Other Assets etc. On the Liabilities side though, it seems $15MM is being rolled through with only $45MM injected as new equity (theres no other debt, minor amount of liab. Thats whats throwing me off as I would have seen $55MM..not sure how to search this on google either but I will go over some purchase accounting info online as well. Thanks for your response.

 

When a PE firm buys the equity, they buy the equity. It goes to 0. They are valuing that management stake at 5mm, so they are exchanging shares of ownership for new shares. You need to wipe the old equity and now equity is $60mm. Doesn't matter if it was 100mm or 2mm or (73mm) in the shareholder equity account. It is 0. The shares are what are purchased in this case for $60mm.

 

Ab ut voluptates non tempora voluptate. Et atque itaque occaecati quos. Quia sunt nemo ut eos. Et voluptatum necessitatibus non enim provident qui.

Quasi consectetur facere quidem quia ut. Eius beatae ipsam assumenda sint blanditiis. Est distinctio fuga voluptates odio est eos. Sit sequi quaerat facilis praesentium cum est odit necessitatibus.

Et sit id assumenda quis. Libero modi praesentium repudiandae architecto. Omnis recusandae ipsa possimus sed.

Modi qui laudantium minima enim ut unde. Est aliquid magnam et laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”