splitting hairs - pe exits at top groups
I don't mean to start a debate over which top group exits are better. Just genuinely curious why it appears some pe firms seem to have a propensity for hiring from ms/gs as opposed to jp.
case in point, h&f: apart from consultants, their hiring is mostly from ms and gs with not a single jp analyst. it's hard to imagine that there wouldn't be a jp analyst suitable for the job - at the top level how different can analysts at jp/ms/gs really be.
so what exactly explains the discrepancy at a firm like h&f (Truthfully, i don't know if such a discrepancy exits at other top pe firms)? why is there an underrepresentation of jpm - is it a cultural thing and a self-serving cycle where former gs/ms pick gs/ms candidates for interviews. do hhs just not pick jpm analysts to show h&f? is there a similar phenomenon at other pe firms?
H&F likes their pedigree and chillers from MS over boutique hardos
.
Chill bro, just saying facts
H&F absolutely hires boutique hardos. Especially ones in Rx who are the hardest of the hardos
Not true, half from MS and other half from GS
.
Del
Its Laz Rx tho
H&F cares a lot about prestige - they mostly only hire from HYP+W+D as you can tell
so would it be fair to say in the eyes of h&f jpm isn't as prestigious as ms or gs?
Not just H&F eyes lol
Why not S/MIT or UChi/NW?
S is more suited for TB. UChi yes but the if they can get HYP then why UChi.
Quo expedita labore labore accusantium quia in nisi. Et quia a rerum deserunt nesciunt voluptas molestias eos. Voluptas eligendi odio ut et ut. Aut sed adipisci provident labore velit.
Mollitia nobis sequi deleniti aut odit aut eius. Omnis repellat et consequatur qui a autem dolore. Sed expedita voluptatibus totam id.
Corporis accusantium quod ut debitis. Magni omnis dignissimos quam dignissimos. Corrupti assumenda pariatur voluptas sapiente. Explicabo distinctio officia vero distinctio.
Non quam non sed quod quod aut tenetur. Numquam explicabo debitis fugiat unde. Ea distinctio non architecto optio dolor sed. Et molestiae ratione dolorem facere maiores. Ratione officia eos tenetur numquam repellat omnis. Assumenda nulla aspernatur repellat temporibus aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...