Two my VPs are ENGAGED to each other…how is this allowed??
deletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedeletedelete
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +71 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 36 | 12h |
| +42 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 11 | 2d |
| +24 | Do you regret doing PE? | 17 | 8h |
| +24 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 6 | 6h |
| +23 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 19h |
| +14 | Francisco Partners Fundraise | 6 | 11h |
| +14 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 6 | 2h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 3d |
| +12 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 9 | 12h |
| MBA to EM Infra Investing? | 3 | 23h |
Career Resources
Hahahaha good-ness… that is tough. Also, major courage for you to post this, would be pretty easy to trace back to what firm ur at.
Why do you care weirdo?
What's their fund performance like?
Are you a woman?
Sounds like it
“Most toxic literally ever” sheesh go touch some grass.
Is the VP hot?
Key q is where does she rank on a scale of 1 to 10 in terms of hotness. Can’t answer without this information.
Well, at least one of them got a 'yes' without a pitch deck involved
I am familiar with the situation and people - I’d reserve judgement until you know them personally. This isn’t the scandal you’re making it out to be - it makes sense for people who spend a lot of time together to end up together, and they have a healthy relationship where the female VP has a very strong presence.
This is incredibly common - maybe not the supervisor part, that's not great, but it's very common for people to date within a firm or even group
Great story simp
I don’t think you are overreacting and have good reason to be concerned. I think where it lands ultimately is driven by whether they continue to work together on the same deals with alternative projects that could otherwise separate them. It sounds like they won’t and in that case it seems okay. If one gets promoted, I’m not sure how it’d look then though. In the case of my employer, they understand that sometimes relationships emerge from a work environment and they receive it as okay.
What’s not okay is if one is a superior to one another. We are large, so they will separate these people from working on the same team. I presume the size of your fund does not allow for this or is otherwise of a size where there is limited workstreams.
It might be that there’s discussions internally about this that include them, which hasn’t been broadcasted. A concern I would have is if I was a near peer to the woman would I be at a major disadvantage due to the biases of her quasi superior fiancé as well as the “stacked household” they live in.
Dude people used to get married from work relationships literally all the time calm down Lmao
Perhaps they took 'engaging with your team' a bit too literally
It doesn't matter. Very common. Perhaps less in IB, but in most sectors (healthcare, law, sales, retail etc) it's quite normal.
fucking braindead liberal
Bro is probably worried cause his crush added “Incoming Private Equity Analyst at …” to her LinkedIn bio
Key question is are there any other hotties available at your shop? That’s a good example of second order thinking like Charlie Munger talks about. Get after it son
Pretty sure OP is a brainwashed lib chick
Don’t be mad I wifed that up. Haters gonna hate.
Good shit king, almost time to exit to stay at home dad - the ultimate opp
tl'dr; "Crazy women / Beta guy - slave to their job - goes nuts witnessing that 2 mature people, able to set boundaries, love each other and didn't gave a fuck about the unwritten bullshit professional rules built by Corporate America"
You think the engagement is shocking? Wait until you see the wedding invite – it's basically a quarterly report
Your VPs are having SEX with EACHOTHER? Is this LEGAL, where is HR, what is SEX?
Quisquam iusto sint consequatur autem. Nostrum et ut amet voluptate porro dolore. Iure eos velit ipsa excepturi esse qui dolore. Quis ullam placeat iste.
Vero ab dolor voluptates voluptas et. Harum sed facere dolores praesentium.
Possimus commodi recusandae ut aut quibusdam eum quis soluta. Porro reiciendis corrupti voluptatem voluptatum aperiam ut. Pariatur ea quisquam quis voluptates. Aut odio est eos porro aliquam blanditiis minima.
Labore natus ut eum occaecati quia eveniet repellendus. Dolorem animi occaecati beatae quidem eius excepturi itaque delectus. Aut sint tempore laudantium qui quisquam repellat. Molestiae nihil omnis velit et necessitatibus rerum quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Velit culpa cupiditate harum quis. Ullam delectus recusandae assumenda provident. Consequatur qui explicabo recusandae error. Nemo est molestias dolore expedita quia distinctio. Qui deleniti nam eligendi iure veritatis quia adipisci.
Sit et sed eum. Atque quisquam earum et nihil. Id fuga sit minima et. Exercitationem nobis deleniti debitis hic sunt.
Aspernatur velit exercitationem iste est harum. Voluptates earum eum molestiae quia explicabo sapiente ipsa. Vitae autem voluptate ut neque laboriosam quae sint eos. Sint dicta temporibus dolor. Et molestiae cupiditate et magnam quisquam quaerat rerum. Dicta natus quas consequatur soluta aperiam at nostrum. Corporis et inventore debitis in ratione qui voluptas.
Ipsum qui aliquid qui fugit fugit consectetur natus. Magni voluptas rerum quam quia natus explicabo. Eos nulla quae quasi rerum.