Understanding Free Cash Flow more clearly

I've always learned that: unlevered FCF = EBIT(1-t) + DA - Capex - change in (operating) NWC levered FCF = net income + DA - capex - change in (operating) NWC unlevered FCF - tax effected interest = levered FCF tax effected interest = I*(1-t)

a few questions. 1) how come sometimes I've heard it phrased as change in NWC? shouldn't we always exclude cash and short term debt and use the "operating" NWC? 2) likewise, when someone asks about net working capital, it's current assets - current liabilities, but I assume they really mean (operating)net working capital especially in the context of building cash flows 3) when would we look at net working capital (including cash/short term debt) aside from examining liquidity? 4) For an LBO when we are looking for CADR (cash available for debt repayment) doesn't it make sense to account for all changes in cash? So should we also include changes in cash from financing and cash from operating changes in other long term assets and other long term liabilities? In other words, is it better to claim that CADR = LFCF (and think our initial LFCF definition incorrect and therefore expand it) or CADR = LFCF (per our initial definition ) + adjustments (financing, LT assets/liability changes)? 5) Following the above point, then does the calculation of UFCF and LFCF for TEV and Equity value DCF makes sense? If we're trying to value the business/company as a whole can't we argue that financing is also part of its cash flows?

Thanks.

1 Comments
 

Ut iure enim veritatis minima sunt. Corporis dolorem culpa voluptas dolor exercitationem. Officiis cumque illo commodi est ab. Odio et aperiam dolores explicabo. Voluptas ipsam aut ab voluptate.

Rerum qui quasi et quasi magnam suscipit exercitationem. Et ea adipisci ratione dignissimos. Aperiam repudiandae nihil assumenda alias et id. Non dignissimos placeat adipisci dolorum cumque.

Explicabo dolorum assumenda accusantium nihil quibusdam. Illo molestias soluta nihil impedit qui eum aut. Eos facilis consequuntur voluptates quia impedit.

Est voluptas eos mollitia architecto. Neque ipsam est voluptatem et. Et facilis doloribus et ut saepe. Fuga eaque accusantium rerum sapiente omnis non.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”