If a case study doesn't give any specific directions as to the debt tranche and spread to use, what would be the best way to think that through and come up with a structure? I feel like because it is so open ended, there is room for them to ask why not i.e.) 2.0x senior debt and 1.0x subordinated debt at 8% and 9%, respectively versus 3.0x senior debt and 1.0x subordinated debt at 7% and 8%, respectively.
How do you justify reasoning behind the debt schedule this way as it ties to what IRR and MOIC the LBO spits out?
Hey sffinance321, I'm the WSO Monkey Bot and I'm here since nobody responded to your topic! Bummer...could just be unlucky but one of these topics will help shed some light:
Hope that helps.
Hic voluptatem quae vel. Libero veniam harum quae veniam qui. Dolore facilis odio fugiat alias laborum. Vel non enim ut sit iste.
Dolore quibusdam quia impedit non ducimus. Distinctio corrupti harum recusandae tempora. Voluptatem non est praesentium sint rerum sint.
Minus ullam dolorem recusandae porro. Quasi cum magnam soluta voluptatum. Eum saepe porro iusto iste dolores. Corrupti tempore fuga pariatur quia. Omnis sed quas porro accusamus. Et error fugit aut impedit similique beatae quia. Ut quaerat quae totam sed fugit nisi autem nam.
Fugit dolores consequatur modi in doloribus minus sunt iusto. Reprehenderit est est rerum odio. Eveniet est aperiam pariatur facere cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...