What is considered a megafund in the PE space?
Their entire AUM is $150 billion but not exclusively PE which is around $22 billion, also credit and real estate.
Their entire AUM is $150 billion but not exclusively PE which is around $22 billion, also credit and real estate.
| +86 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 13m |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 20 | 22h |
| +51 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 17m |
| +42 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 23 | 1d |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 3d |
| +26 | SGE Final Round (Investment Summer Analyst) - Case Study & Technicals? | 13 | 6d |
| +19 | Senior IR Lifestyle | 3 | 5d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 4d |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 18h |
| +12 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
The definition of what constitutes a MF these days is somewhat convoluted. Some define it as a firm with a 10bn+ fund, but tbh there is no set or agreed upon definition. Imo I feel like the definition of a MF should be some combo of fund size and the presence of multiple strategies, i.e. what you see at the larger alternative asset managers (i.e. BX, KKR, CG, etc.). If a firm has a large fund and multiple PE strategies (multiple funds, maybe a mid market vehicle or a sector focused vehicle) I think we tend to unanimously agree on their MF status. For example KKR has continued to raise very large, but not as large of funds as some up and coming players (Thoma, etc.) yet there is a never a discussion on if KKR is a MF or not because of the fact that they still raise large funds and have multiple strategies where they have sizable vehicles.
To get back to your question, Ares has in the past raised significant capital (~8bn for their flagship in 2016) and are currently targeting just under 10bn for the next iteration of ACOF. That being said they also just raised 3.5bn for a special opps vehicle and also have an energy PE fund. Overall it comes down to what your definition of a MF is, though I would say the firm’s characteristics at least warrant consideration to be labeled as such (for what it’s worth, they are definitely a MF imo)
Only on this site does the above discussion even take place. Because whether or not you think advent or h&f are mega funds they’ll show up to auctions and bid against youR pe fund if you’re bx or kkr so....?
Explicabo a doloribus consequatur ut porro nihil odit. Voluptas et molestias architecto optio. Distinctio expedita ea ab voluptatibus asperiores ut. Reprehenderit dicta modi repellat modi dolorum alias non. Ut sit alias ducimus consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...