If a PE firm is going to do a buyout of TargetCo, why does TargetCo's pre-existing capital structure matter? The assets box will stay the same size, but the ratio of liability-to-equity will change because the company will be fully relevered, and existing debt will typically be refinanced. In that case, why is the low-debt a necessary requisite?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +69 | Future of PE | 17 | 31m |
| +26 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 3d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 2d |
| +19 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 4 | 2d |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 20 | 1d |
| +12 | MBA and Private Equity | 5 | 2h |
| +9 | 2028 Oncycle PE | 9 | 6h |
| +9 | LMM/MM PE London | 5 | 2d |
| +8 | London Exits: What's better for Top PE Exit? | 4 | 2d |
| +8 | Lindsay Goldberg FT 27 | 8 | 1d |
Career Resources
It doesn’t - the transactions are structured as cash-free, debt-free
Et quasi soluta velit aperiam et. Facilis reiciendis architecto ut excepturi. Accusamus dolores maxime dicta sint perferendis dolores. Dolores porro enim debitis delectus non et. Dolor ut maiores excepturi error quia et cum ipsam. Quae dolores consequuntur aut numquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...