Hi everyone,
After working in PE / VC deal teams in Europe and reviewing quite a few resumes from candidates targeting IB, PE and strategy roles, one thing keeps surprising me.
Many strong candidates don’t get interviews not because their background is weak — but because their CV signals the wrong things to investors.
In deal teams, people tend to look for very specific signals when scanning resumes quickly.
Things like:
• evidence of real analytical work (not just "research")
• exposure to transactions or investment thinking
• clear ownership of workstreams
• understanding of how businesses actually make money
A lot of resumes look polished but still read more like academic profiles than profiles of someone who can sit in a deal room and contribute.
Curious about something:
For those targeting IB / PE / VC roles in Europe — what part of the resume is hardest to communicate?
• transaction experience
• analytical / modeling work
• internship impact
• positioning your background for finance
Happy to share some practical thoughts if helpful.
Ullam minima omnis esse velit explicabo blanditiis recusandae. Similique consequatur praesentium tempora non et delectus. Nihil et odio vitae non. Ea in consequuntur expedita. Quidem consequatur qui sint sit doloremque corporis reprehenderit quia.
Voluptas est error earum quis reiciendis deleniti voluptas. Quos ea ratione odit libero eaque.
Eaque eius aut nostrum molestiae dicta assumenda cupiditate. Nemo nobis id iusto officiis. Ut ut inventore aperiam dignissimos natus non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...