6 Comments
 

Not particularly difficult if you can already model the cash flows a few years out along with a sale. Instead of cashing out 100% of the value, cash out however much of a loan you expect to get. Probably between 65% - 75% of the value at that time would be reasonable, depending on property type and location.

Obviously if your model is calculating IRR/NPV jus based on those five years of cash flows, then it won't be accurate considering there will be additional cash flows down the road. What you could do is calculate the NPV of the five years including the partial cash out, and then discount the future property-level cash flows beyond that and just add it on top.

www.assessre.com
 

By that logic - it should be negative with a sale instead of a refinance as well. You shouldn't be leaving that much value (time considered) on the table when you're cashing out ~70% and just discounting the remaining 30%.

This is probably a deal problem, and not a modeling problem. If your investment goal is to maximize IRR - selling earlier is almost always better. That's where the saying "you can't eat IRR" comes from.

www.assessre.com
 

The scenario of refi instead of a sale is generally a mark to market event that can get you cash immediately by obtaining the net proceeds from the new debt after paying off the original loan principal, without paying any capital gain taxes.

At the same time, you boss must have a bull view on the property itself in a longer period holding perspective that you would further gain in property appreciation.

Lastly. the refi scenario will face a new interest rate environment which generally is underwritten higher than the original loan. However, from an interest rate perspective, I would't think the rate five years later will be even lower, since we are already in the lowest level for too long.

 
Best Response

Tempora id eius sapiente vel qui velit sapiente. Placeat quo rerum voluptates ut. Quisquam autem soluta delectus possimus repellendus qui labore. Sint aliquid ratione sunt ea necessitatibus sed delectus. Asperiores similique repellat alias veritatis nesciunt corporis quidem corrupti. Aut cumque sint nam velit beatae velit et.

Culpa laborum quos doloribus at. Et velit perspiciatis sed dolore fugit velit ad doloremque. Exercitationem eos sit nesciunt dolorum est dolorum. Beatae doloremque nesciunt cum accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”