Analyzing Aged Delinquencies in Multifamily

I've got a couple questions for the multifamily people out there:

1)  How do you read a delinquency report like the one below? There are columns labeled Amount, followed by Current, 1, 2, 3, & 4 Months. I'm assuming that any charge listed is an outstanding delinquency, and that Current = the charge is less that 30 days delinquent, 1 Month = 30-60 days, 2 Months = 61-90 days, etc. Is this correct?  At the very bottom of my example, there is a $42 charge that nets out to $0. Is that tracked like that to show the history of tenants?

2) How do you tie this into your risk analysis? Obviously the more delinquency the higher the risk, but are there any ratios/rules of thumbs you can use to help classify the level of delinquency? (i.e. anything over 1.5% of tenants or as a percentage of rent income is a concerning.) I don't see a lot of MF so I'm not sure what is normal. My example is an early 2000's build, probably a B+ building, with an A+ location in the CBD, and most tenants are young professionals.

I've attached a screenshot of the report I'm trying to analyze. Redacted full names and property info for obvious reasons.

Thanks! I appreciate any help I can get. 

image-20240904112611-1

8 Comments
 
Most Helpful

1) That is correct. The importance of the current / 0-30 column is going to highly depend on the date of the report and the corresponding 31-60 balances. If the report is dated the 3rd of the month, it's pretty immaterial. Shit, I just had my automatic payment go out for September rent today on the 4th since a late fee isn't assessed until the 5th. Anyone greater than 1 month delinquent should raise concerns, and there are hopefully notes in the AR report tracking the onsite team's communication with the tenant. I'm not entirely sure what the netted out charge at the bottom is, but my guess is it's a new applicant that wrote a check for their app fee and the office hasn't cleared the check yet to eliminate the charge on their account. 

2) There really is no one-size-fits-all approach to MF AR. Balances can be high because of shit management. They can also be high today if a property is located in a city that still has strong COVID protections for past balances or is still back logged with processing evictions (see this a lot still in the Seattle MSA). But yes, a high AR balance is a risk and does say something about the tenant profile of the general area. One thing I will note - if you see a property carrying a lot of AR, be sure to ask the owner if the report is including past tenant balances. I've seen some shady shit on that front.

 

Past in regards to tenancy. It's common for AR to be written off as bad debt on the P&L once a tenant w/ an outstanding balance moves out.

AR Reports will sometimes have a column specifying that the resident is a current occupant. I'm not suggesting you should look out for this on every deal you underwrite, but if there's a lot of noise in the AR and very little bad debt written off on the T12, it's just something to be aware of (since we're on this specific topic).

 

On this note, what does “prepays” mean? I have often seen that in a AR report and it is usually a negative number. 

It’s someone who paid early for whatever that charge is. The report shows delinquency balances, so those are positive numbers even though we think of delinquency as a “bad” thing and positive numbers as a “good” thing. An example of a prepay is someone who overpaid rent by $200 on 9/1. If you receive an A/R on 9/28 showing a -$200 prepay, it’s a credit - they will only be billed for their full rent less $200 on 10/1. But in the meantime the credit has to be carried somewhere, and would ultimately reduce the total balance of rent due and thus is showed as a negative. 

 

Ea qui maxime et. Voluptatem voluptates vel est hic quos vel illum. Voluptatem rem autem cupiditate odit. Ipsa a similique illum dolore est maxime quo. Impedit incidunt consequatur repellendus id quae sint aliquid.

Quo commodi sed qui ut fugit. Sed necessitatibus laboriosam dolores possimus. Quis quo est quam est voluptate voluptatibus accusantium. Aperiam consequatur quos tempore iste ex. Consequatur sunt magnam a ut eligendi.

Fugit quam aspernatur molestiae nobis id maiores ipsam. Minus rerum minus molestiae unde. Voluptatibus et iusto et iusto et. Nihil deserunt nisi tempore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”