Argus Question - General Vacancy/Static Vacancy

Can anyone answer this?

If you’re underwriting a building and holding 7% of the space static throughout the hold period, but then applying a 10% general vacancy factor in Argus. How is the general vacancy calculated for each year? Right now it’s showing an average annual general vacancy of about 2.3% of PGR. I’m trying to back into this; does anyone know the actual formula/methodology Argus uses? Assuming it depends on rollover and downtime.

I understand the flip side. If I had 7% GVAC but 10% static throughout my hold period, there would never be a GVAC applied since it’s less then the static space.

7 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's how general vacancy (GV) is typically calculated in Argus and how it interacts with static vacancy:

  1. General Vacancy Factor in Argus:

    • General vacancy is applied as a percentage of the potential gross revenue (PGR). It acts as a buffer to account for market vacancy or other risks, such as tenants falling behind on rent or going bankrupt.
    • In Argus, if you have a static vacancy (e.g., 7% of the space held vacant throughout the hold period), the general vacancy factor (e.g., 10%) is adjusted to avoid double-counting vacancy losses.
  2. How Argus Adjusts General Vacancy:

    • Argus deducts the static vacancy from the general vacancy calculation. For example, if you have 7% static vacancy and a 10% general vacancy factor, Argus will only apply the general vacancy to the remaining occupied space.
    • This ensures that the general vacancy is not applied to the portion of the space already accounted for as static vacancy.
  3. Why You See 2.3% of PGR:

    • The 2.3% average annual general vacancy you're seeing is likely the result of Argus prorating the general vacancy factor after accounting for the static vacancy and any absorption/turnover vacancy. The exact formula depends on the lease rollovers, downtime assumptions, and how much of the space is already vacant.
  4. Key Considerations:

    • If the static vacancy (7%) exceeds the general vacancy factor (10%), Argus will not apply any additional general vacancy, as the static vacancy already covers the risk.
    • The interaction between rollover, downtime, and static vacancy can further influence the effective general vacancy applied.

To back into the calculation, you would need to: - Identify the potential gross revenue (PGR) for each year. - Subtract the static vacancy (7% of space) from the PGR. - Apply the general vacancy factor (10%) to the remaining revenue after accounting for static vacancy and any absorption/turnover vacancy.

If you're still unclear, reviewing the Argus manual or consulting with someone experienced in Argus modeling might help clarify the specific methodology used in your scenario.

Sources: General Vacancy Deductions

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

If you have 10% gv and 6% static, it’s really 6% static and ~4% gv. The reason I use “~” is because static vacancy is being calculated based on physical occupancy/vacancy but gv is calculated based on economic occupancy/vacancy so the numbers won’t tie our exactly.

 

Quis blanditiis quo aut. Ut impedit a omnis qui.

Et maiores facere enim eum iure praesentium. Sed ut ab corporis est nisi minima dolores. Quis vel facere nihil magnam dolor. Quia vel blanditiis architecto vero officiis. Earum et quibusdam quisquam sed ipsam debitis.

Deserunt rerum voluptatem qui numquam. Sint dolor laboriosam ut iusto. Voluptatem libero doloremque sed commodi aperiam eius.

Nemo velit illum optio aliquid. Dolor voluptas unde ipsam et libero provident deleniti. Repudiandae veniam repellat et aut dolores in ratione. Repudiandae hic corrupti aut nostrum est dolor. Nobis ut perspiciatis minus est dolores voluptatem et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”