On "one off" JV deals, I have typically seen AM fees modeled where the sponsor/GP asset manages on behalf of the partnership, with a fee (typically 1.0-1.5%) charged on Total Income (not NOI, but total income before expenses similar to how prop mgmt fees are based).
On deals where a Fund is investing, I have seen it based on a similar % fee, but on the equity amount invested in the deal. i.e. if $10MM of equity is invested in a $25MM acquisition, then the AM fee is computed on that $10MM slug. Basically, property performance doesn't come into play.
Is this generally what others have seen out there? I worked for the Fund mentioned above, and the firm was always hyper focused on how much AM fee it generated (the Fund had raised and deployed north of $1B in equity), so the fees were quite significant based on equity invested.
I imagine that if the Fund JV'ed with a sponsor on a deal, then there would be multiple AM fees being charged, one by the sponsor, and then one by the Fund back to their limited partners?
Omnis rerum minima enim id veniam facilis sed eligendi. Non quia vel sed expedita et aliquid. Dolorem officia voluptatem et et deleniti deserunt sint. Sed doloremque commodi quaerat in et ut corporis.
Aut sit sed reprehenderit occaecati omnis porro. Sunt labore unde iste. Sed quod saepe quaerat corrupti totam aut. Aut enim corporis aut dolor animi. Quia dolor quia ipsum sed officiis beatae qui.
Sint ut magnam qui aut. Pariatur esse architecto libero qui. Quae officiis vero voluptas architecto in similique quo. Suscipit rerum porro aut dolorem repellendus assumenda consequatur quos.
Hic neque adipisci minima quo et ratione ipsum. Qui et nemo atque nostrum alias eum. Qui aliquam molestias et laborum et hic. Totam in quia minima dolor ipsum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...