Basis play / value-add office in high-growth markets - value trap or generational buy?

Is anyone seeing groups actually make money on buying well-located office at a steep discount to replacement cost in strong growth markets? Thinking value-add deals. What are your thoughts on long-term potential here?

13 Comments
 

Too soon because most investments were made in 2024-today and won't be realized for another several years. I don't think the value-add space is terribly interesting because so many of those buildings are 80s vintage, in so-so locations, functionally obsolete, and/or a CapEx sink. I think the more interesting trade is the core or core-plus stuff in the southeast. Can buy nice new stuff for $500 PSF and it costs $800+ PSF to build. And it's mostly full or will be in the next 12-18 months. 

 
Most Helpful

I took a look at some opportunities a few years ago and this was also my take-away.

You could buy brand new buildings in primary submarkets of secondary markets that had recently stabilized with a weighted average WALT of 7.00+ at 9.00% - 10.00%+ forward capitalization rates which was well below replacement costs.  A Developer basically took all of the risks over 5 - 7 years and you could buy that product for 75 cents on the dollar.

Or you could pursue deep value opportunities that required a lot of capital expenditures, renovations, and tenant improvements / inducements in hopes to lease-up over a 5 year period.  They were all horrible risk adjusted returns and many of those opportunities transacted so I am curious where they land.

The other thing I noticed that doesn't show up in the numbers is how horrible the floor plates / floor plans / layout designs were of many of these 80s / 90s vintage building.  They were so inefficient and most likely obsolete without any real conversion opportunities.

Speaking of value-add office, an institutional player down the road from my house bought a campus two years ago and completely tore down hundreds of thousands of sq ft to put in last mile logistics.  They are still in the demolition phase but interesting to see these Class A (quality) buildings get torn down because there's not enough demand for the space anymore.

 

I think the really great buys of top of the top Class A office are behind us, although there are probably still good buys there. The Class A- or B stuff is still too early to tell. You are taking risk there, but obviously that's what they buyers of the Class A stuff were doing 18-24 months ago and it's worked out very well. 

 

My firm is capitalizing on the resurgence of well located office and getting crushed by shitty office. (All purchased pre 2019).

When thinking about distress, I go to MF automatically given recent headlines. Overall, I think office is a different animal than MF. In MF operator’s bought these things at sky high prices on an aggressive pro forma. These guys can’t afford to continue to put money in deals so the assets go to shit and by the time the lender steps in, the situation can be very bad.

Office operators are more institutional and have capital to protect the assets. Tenant improvements and LC’s aren’t cheap. The value-add office play makes sense to me because rent has sky rocketed and a lot of tenants don’t want to pay a massive increase at the end of their lease and will go 3 miles down the highway (using Dallas as an ex). In this case, buying a kinda crappy office close to where the expensive stuff is makes sense if you can do a strong TI plan and properly amenitize the asset.

Would love to hear other opinions.

 

Associate 3 in RE - Comm

There are legitimate mark to market leasing office plays in strong markets.

Whose the Core take out buyer of office?

No major institutional core investor is going to touch 99% of office assets anytime soon

It’s really a terrible investment product when you think about it 

Just constantly throwing money at it and Tenants typically always have all the leverage 

 

Cum quas officiis eos dolorem odit et id impedit. Delectus magnam eum quisquam accusantium.

Reiciendis sint eius at eos qui. Est consequatur cumque quis voluptatem. Repellendus rem labore repellat vero fugit modi vitae illum.

Cupiditate aut vero aliquid voluptas rerum veritatis. Ut corporis molestiae iusto quidem adipisci earum. In consequuntur quos facilis autem soluta dolores est. Autem omnis tempora numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”