Converting a deal

Curious - does ever monkey here believe that RE is a "numbers game?" Meaning, you need to thoroughly look at 100 deals in order to convert 1.

I'm more of a believer that if you can work smarter and more tactfully; your conversion percentages improve, but all I ever hear from the grey hairs is that it is a "numbers game."

Curious to get some other opinions.

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Hi,Senior undergrad here who has 1 yr intern exp.in Acq so don't listen to me, but I think it depends on your investment strategy/thesis.If you are a more thematic investor such as BX that seeks to identify a culmination of macro tailwinds behind a sector before investing, then you may find buying opportunities at a much higher rate than 1% of deal flow.  This is because if you believe that a sector is going to experience very rapid growth over the coming years (10%+ YoY), there will inherently be widespread mispricing opportunities for alpha generation as the buyer pool you are competing against will almost never UW above 5% regardless of how strong they think growth will be. Since DCF valuation is the bread and butter of RE investment, those assets will trade at a discount to intrinsic value and therefore provide a lot of buying opportunities above 1/100 deals.On the other hand, if your group has a relative value approach to investing (buying assets at a relative discount based on similar trades in a specific market or submarket), which most funds do, you will likely find buying opportunities closer to the 1% level. Just some thoughts though, curious what others may have to add...

 

It depends really. If you're a fund that needs to deploy capital, then yes, it's a numbers game. If you're a value add or development shop, then it's all about creativity. How can you extract value from an asset that others may not see? How well can you sell? How can you turn shit into gold?

That's what real estate is really about. Otherwise it's no different than fixed-income investing.

 

Id earum et aut omnis consequuntur aut enim. Sit quaerat in commodi cum. Fuga et tempore in et nemo non expedita est. Ratione quam et ut beatae modi veritatis. Sed suscipit quos eveniet numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”