So I see what CRE Analysts puts out but it seems bipolar (no offense to anyone that is bipolar).
Some days it seems rational and logical and other days it seems to have no tie to reality. Do they have multiple people writing these posts? Is there anyone trying to have a consistent voice? Sometimes they have great content and then the person answering the comments has a totally different position.
Any insight would be appreciated.
| +51 | Leave brokerage to be GP | 12 | 1d | |
| +46 | New Comp Database - Google Form (Now with Data Validation) | 24 | 1d | |
| +24 | Seeking Career Guidance in Real Estate Development Post-Graduation | 3 | 2d | |
| +23 | Going out on your own | 4 | 1d | |
| +22 | REPE/Development GPA | 15 | 3d | |
| +21 | Real Estate = complicated + underpaid | 15 | 1d | |
| +18 | Spreads over SOFR/UST | 4 | 4s | |
| +17 | Fisher Brothers | 6 | 1d | |
| +17 | MSRE/MSRED with no RE experience; Naive to think I’ll land a job afterwards? | 4 | 5d | |
| +15 | Can you exit from Fund to Asset management or Investment in Real Estate ? | 21 | 2s |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ah, the life of a CRE analyst – always keeping you on your toes, right? Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not uncommon for there to be multiple voices and perspectives contributing to forums and posts, especially in a dynamic field like commercial real estate (CRE). Here's a bit more insight:
Multiple Contributors: It's likely that more than one person is writing these posts or responding to comments. In a forum setting, you'll often find a variety of professionals, each with their own experiences and viewpoints, contributing to the conversation.
Diverse Opinions: The CRE industry encompasses a wide range of markets and specialties. This diversity can lead to different interpretations and opinions on the same topic, which might explain the bipolar nature of the content you're seeing.
Content Quality: On good days, you might be getting insights from seasoned pros who have their finger on the pulse of the market. On off days, you might be reading posts from less experienced individuals or those with a more theoretical understanding of the industry.
Consistency Efforts: While there may be efforts to maintain a consistent voice, the open nature of forums like WSO means that anyone can chime in, which can lead to varying levels of quality and consistency in the content.
Remember, it's always a good idea to cross-reference information and look for the most credible and consistent sources, especially when making decisions based on forum advice. Keep swinging through the jungle of opinions, and you'll find the golden bananas of wisdom!
Sources: Diversity in CRE, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/whats-with-all-the-ibpe-bros-asking-about-cre?customgpt=1, CRE Development Analyst, Real Estate Megathread - The Best RE Posts on WSO, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/diversity-in-cre?customgpt=1
Agreed - it’s often really hit or miss as it goes content wise
They have multiple writers and people who send in submissions. 3 main guys are behind the writing. 2 land developers and MetLife’s Texas portfolio manager. I took the class. It’s mainly the MetLife guy posting last time I spoke to them.
Their views just seem so inconsistent
Are their classes any good? Should I recommend them my interns or even put analysts in them? Is it just underwriting?
Yes, I think you should put analyst through it. Firms like JLL, Newmark, Stream, Trigate etc usually put analyst through it. Interns maybe not since the cost is $5k. Also, I’m unsure if a class is taught in the summer (they are live). I think it gives a really great foundation of the fundamentals behind decision making in real estate. They are big on the why behind everything. It’s not a modeling class, although they can learn to model as an extra credit outside of course hours. They have videos walking through cases apart from class in the underwriting section. You can schedule a call with them to learn more about it on their website with the 2 owners/instructors, or feel free to PM me for a more unbiased review.
Thanks!
Voluptate id fuga sit veniam sit consequatur sunt. Quaerat laboriosam sint et eius. Exercitationem porro rerum repellat at mollitia. Et recusandae libero officia. Laboriosam sed illo ipsum qui officiis ipsa eum aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...