Hey all, I know that return on cost or yield on cost is calculated based on NOI/ total cost. Out of curiosity, does anyone factor in general vacancy into the NOI number?
| +59 | Development Fees > Sponsor Equity Contribution | 18 | 16h |
| +57 | What's an Undergrad to Do? | 21 | 2d |
| +42 | Advice to Job Seekers: Don't Sleep on Asset Management | 13 | 1d |
| +24 | Mid Sized REPE firm for first job in RE | 9 | 17h |
| +10 | Full-Time RE Acquisitions Analyst Recruiting - Class of 2028 | 4 | 1d |
| +3 | Thoughts on CIM Group today? | 11 | 1d |
| +3 | LDG Development wins $36.3M Lawsuit | 1 | 14h |
| +3 | Debt fund jobs | 1 | 3d |
| +3 | Tishman Speyer Debt Fund | 0 | 4d |
| +1 | Equity Waterfall - Market Standard | 2 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
yes
Yes, a trended RoC figure, most typically, should include some general vacancy assumption else you'll be overstating yield. A scenario where you potentially wouldn't are if you're developing a BTS, single-tenant office/industrial/retail asset with 10+ years of WALT.
Labore neque tenetur nostrum iusto magni est consectetur. Odio dolorem consequatur qui eligendi est quis. Expedita dolorem et odit ut incidunt vel velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...