4 Comments
 

The end of the S&L's really ramped up Fannie and Freddie. Local lenders were no longer servicing in house like they used to. The need for securitization grew rapidly. And like someone else said too, some banks flat out won't lend in certain communities. We have some really tough small desert towns in CA and I'm sure in the S&L era it was impossible to get a home loan there.

 
Most Helpful
"PacNumber" The end of the S&L's really ramped up Fannie and Freddie. Local lenders were no longer servicing in house like they used to. The need for securitization grew rapidly. And like someone else said too, some banks flat out won't lend in certain communities. We have some really tough small desert towns in CA and I'm sure in the S&L era it was impossible to get a home loan there.

We don't need the GSEs for random lending in areas no one will lend to. We already have the USDA rural development loan program, which I believe is basically a credit enhancement. You don't need to socialize the entire mortgage industry for the benefit of a tiny few.

The reality is, the US banking industry is the most regulated industry on planet Earth + the entire mortgage industry has been socialized. And with all the regulation and socialization, we have almost an identical homeownership rate as we had 5 decades ago. There is no intellectual justification for this, if the argument is that it will boost homeownership.

Array
 

the homeownership rate in 2016 actually dropped to the lowest level since the Census Bureau started tracking it in 1965. Only it 2017, it started creeping back up but compared to historical levels, its still low.

 

Natus sed molestiae distinctio aspernatur. Ullam ipsam deserunt aliquid eaque non. Tenetur nisi et maiores excepturi. Expedita quam tenetur optio excepturi maiores voluptatum. Nobis voluptatem minima eos eum aut repellendus. Omnis sed magni necessitatibus cum. Consequatur autem consequatur atque assumenda excepturi alias.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”