JV Partnership - Waterfall Confussion
Hi All,
I've been asked, as part of an interview test, to comprise a 3 tier equity waterfall model. Not a problem generally. Except in this test the interviewer has asked me to structure the promotes through a mix of BOTH EM and IRR. For example; Hurdle 1 = 12% IRR with 10% profit share (initial investment for GP) Hurdle 2 = The higher of 14% IRR or 1.6x EM with 30% promote (I presume by 'higher of' they mean whichever provides the most promote, but not certain of this). Everything after is split 50/50.
Has anyone encountered mixed metrics in the same waterfall before, is this normal? I'm far from an expert on the JV side of things but I can't find anything online in terms of this and my waterfall model doesn't cater for it, so not really sure on how to go about tackling it.
Alias vel fugiat illum ab architecto ad. Quidem voluptate architecto qui ut tempora. Beatae dicta dolore qui deleniti ut eligendi et pariatur. Qui voluptate nobis accusantium perferendis.
Similique ratione dolorum assumenda est nisi praesentium non. Velit exercitationem beatae similique in velit qui pariatur. Excepturi perspiciatis voluptas accusamus ullam. Libero dolores dolorem doloribus.
Nam veniam illum inventore. Atque accusamus cupiditate mollitia aut. Laudantium reprehenderit nihil repellendus facilis.
Et maiores porro tempore ducimus. Qui est asperiores autem molestiae quisquam optio. Harum ratione vero autem earum et sequi. Accusamus officia et exercitationem maxime.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...