REPE Funds with diversified fund lines

All these repe funds now diversifying across core, core+, opportunistic, debt, separate account. Just asset managers now, collecting fees. They've lost the incentive to overperform. hit the bear minimum required returns, collect the management fees, and roll the investors into the next fund at a larger $ amount since allocators are too lazy to underwrite an entirely new fund any way.

In that light, what are some of the most reputable, or under the radar, repe funds that just run one opportunistic fund line with a broad mandate?

 
Investment Analyst in PE - Other

All these repe funds now diversifying across core, core+, opportunistic, debt, separate account. Just asset managers now, collecting fees.

So, just minor terminology here... but you mean "firms" not... "funds"... those are big time different concepts. As to them being "just asset managers now".... this has always been the case... that is what the business is. Firms raise money based on mandates/desires of their LPs, the LPs drive the show, also just nature of the business. 

Regardless, just start scanning the bottom 50 of the PERE 100 list, will probably find some firms that operate like you suggest (could easily have separate accounts of course, I mean who would turn that down!) 

 

okay grammar police you got the intent...chill dude, clearly I know the difference between a fund and a firm. And the concept of being managers I would disagree with. a FIRM that only runs one opportunistic fund line likely is getting the bulk of pay through promote and aren't managing multiple billions of dollars, they are very incentivized to outperform vs what I mentioned in the title summary.

 
Most Helpful

I guess you havn't read the various "what is REPE" and "is this REPE" posts that happen often on WSO. A lot of people seem to confuse firm type and fund/business strategy (generally missing that firm can do many strategies at once and shift strategy/focus over time). So, take it that I am playing "grammar police" as I know who reads these! (I stipulate that you, OP, have the idea correct).

I think you can find many, small (read.... very unknown) managers running a single fund. This is how people tend to start when "striking out" on their own. 

I'm pretty sure everyone is very well incentivized to outperform, and do you really think any manager is going to pass up deals/opportunities that fit within the fund guidelines if they think they will outperform benchmark or target? Of course not. 

Is it easier to find "home runs" when smaller? Sorta, one "big" homerun deal can juice the overall fund returns much easier than when just a small amount of larger fund. BUT, lack of scale has costs, like ability to do deals and compete (gotta win deals before you can have a shot at outperformance, this is easy to overlook).

This is a BIG reason why the large groups (and their large funds) like Blackstone can do so well, they can buyout deals (whole firms and large portfolios) at the drop of hat. Those lead to big returns if they can "flip" or otherwise boost value (The BX buyout of EOP is the grandest story of this). s

So ironically, if you are an investor (LP) and want your best shot at "outperformance".. you probably will sign up with the big managers. Scale matters too, both to the LP ticket size and the returns profits back to the manager themselves. It's an often said axiom... you can't eat IRR. Related thought... 1% can make you rich, and easier to boost AUM than get deals that will return 30% IRRs to turbocharge the payout from the managers promote. 

That's why you see managers growing to scale when possible, and the smaller "single fund" operators there not by choice/strategy, but by reality (i.e. they can't raise funds otherwise).

 

Beatae non iusto eveniet fuga ullam dolor ut nobis. Quia maiores voluptas et qui ea reprehenderit harum hic. Sunt sit hic nam ratione nihil repudiandae. Neque molestiae corporis sunt eos cumque possimus praesentium. Ad sit in laborum doloremque dignissimos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”