Simple Model Review Checklist

Was wondering if anyone had any tips or a basic checklist of what they look for when reviewing or error-checking an acquisition/development model. We get plenty of models sent to us from GP’s but no two are the same and it can be super tedious to run through each model in depth to make sure everything’s working right.

Are there any basic calc’s you run to make sure returns, cash flow, debt service are working correctly?

Do you have the same process every time, if so, what does it consist of?

Just looking for someone to help a guy with a mild case of self-diagnosed ADHD stay on task when running through someone else’s model.

4 Comments
 

Hey Associate 2 in RE - Comm, I'm here because nobody responded to this thread after a few days...maybe one of these resources will help you:

More suggestions...

If those topics were completely useless, don't blame me, blame my programmers...

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I would generally just sum up the basics in my head and see how far out the results in the models are, then dig deeper into anything I've flagged. Also could input any of the high levels into a model you already know is solid, might not be tailored towards that investment but most calcs remain the same.

On the technical side you could run an IRR on debt/equity interest and capital repayments to make sure they stack up to whatever margins/coupons that are input.

Like you said, at the end of the day they are all different, the detail/layout of the modelling on first glance should give you as much perspective into if the person who put it together knows what they are doing or not.

 

Start with a high level logic check - do the numbers make sense based on the inputs, is everything growing logically year to year, do the numbers tie from page to page, etc. and flag any issues to dig into deeper. After you're comfortable the numbers are at least in the ballpark of where they should be based on the assumptions used, do you not typically underwrite anything compelling in your own model afterwards anyways? Seems crazy to rely on someone else's model.

 

Qui inventore omnis corporis. Sunt culpa nobis et molestias voluptatem minus et dolor.

Velit voluptatem consequuntur eaque dignissimos minus accusamus. Sint facere nobis aperiam provident veritatis soluta. Est magni dicta excepturi dolorem facilis.

In aut inventore qui omnis eius. Sunt voluptatem et consequatur voluptates autem. Facere unde sapiente provident quod ipsam incidunt. Nisi eos dolor nihil consequatur. Earum qui itaque illum at. Deserunt iste in molestiae ipsam quo autem sint harum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”