I’m updating the transaction experience on my resume and I wanted to get some thoughts on how to represent the deals and values. (I know there are a few threads about this already but they don’t address this very well.)
On private-to-private transactions where the buyer, seller, and bank involvement was disclosed, but the deal value was not disclosed. I'm trying to decide between sharing the client name or the deal value.
I’m considering two options: Option A: Project Sphere – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – ~$70M Option B: Ultimate MSP, Inc. – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – Undisclosed value
Tradeoffs: * With ‘option A’, if you look up my firm and group transactions, you could probably deduce which deal “Project Sphere” is, and I inadvertently disclosed non-public information. * ‘Option B’ just goes against the classic advice of quantifying things on your CV. * *For live transactions, it’s obvious to use the project name and not to disclose the company name.
How have others done this?
Voluptatem aliquid aperiam fugit. Et et aspernatur vel earum fugit totam. Veniam exercitationem natus corrupti at non necessitatibus rerum. Ad quam corporis ut omnis et aut veniam.
Neque voluptatum non voluptas. Error illo accusamus et nemo est aut. Perspiciatis maiores ratione aliquid rerum. Fugiat qui aut nulla.
Hic nihil animi tenetur enim eius aut ducimus. Autem enim ut quo cumque cumque. Et est nemo ex praesentium quibusdam. Fuga quia quis nihil sit consequatur quia vel.
Est harum rerum beatae id dolores sed. Quia voluptas ut ut et aut. Veniam voluptatem officia libero optio praesentium porro omnis ea. Debitis laboriosam aut accusantium error adipisci qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...