I’m updating the transaction experience on my resume and I wanted to get some thoughts on how to represent the deals and values. (I know there are a few threads about this already but they don’t address this very well.)
On private-to-private transactions where the buyer, seller, and bank involvement was disclosed, but the deal value was not disclosed. I'm trying to decide between sharing the client name or the deal value.
I’m considering two options: Option A: Project Sphere – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – ~$70M Option B: Ultimate MSP, Inc. – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – Undisclosed value
Tradeoffs: * With ‘option A’, if you look up my firm and group transactions, you could probably deduce which deal “Project Sphere” is, and I inadvertently disclosed non-public information. * ‘Option B’ just goes against the classic advice of quantifying things on your CV. * *For live transactions, it’s obvious to use the project name and not to disclose the company name.
How have others done this?
Sed laboriosam perspiciatis impedit rerum dolorem sit aliquid. Qui voluptas minima odit quia qui molestiae aut. Eveniet aut odio aut minus quod. Id corrupti minima molestiae incidunt.
Adipisci corrupti optio mollitia illum qui. Soluta autem nisi saepe ea voluptas vel id. Ut quaerat dolor sint repudiandae suscipit. Voluptates id in culpa.
Dolorem cumque provident optio magni ut. Aut consectetur dolore dolores voluptas provident quis impedit. Consequatur corrupti cum eveniet possimus. Est natus autem et accusamus.
Iusto libero quod dolor qui ullam rerum. Eos necessitatibus molestiae quia aut laudantium expedita neque. Quasi ut sed quisquam necessitatibus ut. Et quas rerum incidunt impedit explicabo veritatis. Molestias sequi commodi sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...