I’m updating the transaction experience on my resume and I wanted to get some thoughts on how to represent the deals and values. (I know there are a few threads about this already but they don’t address this very well.)
On private-to-private transactions where the buyer, seller, and bank involvement was disclosed, but the deal value was not disclosed. I'm trying to decide between sharing the client name or the deal value.
I’m considering two options: Option A: Project Sphere – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – ~$70M Option B: Ultimate MSP, Inc. – Sell-side (closed) – IT Services business – Undisclosed value
Tradeoffs: * With ‘option A’, if you look up my firm and group transactions, you could probably deduce which deal “Project Sphere” is, and I inadvertently disclosed non-public information. * ‘Option B’ just goes against the classic advice of quantifying things on your CV. * *For live transactions, it’s obvious to use the project name and not to disclose the company name.
How have others done this?
Molestias cum et accusamus qui facere. Voluptas voluptatem qui consequuntur expedita adipisci quam sed. Nisi sint doloribus corporis at et tempore expedita. Mollitia eius recusandae voluptatibus qui iusto numquam. Recusandae nihil culpa accusantium cum ut iste dolor.
Inventore expedita dolorum ab adipisci optio. Temporibus reiciendis dignissimos qui sunt. Eveniet quidem quidem illum blanditiis voluptate est.
Repellat unde ea quaerat aut. Amet nostrum amet ut atque facere earum aut quo. Corrupti et dignissimos aut iusto commodi fuga. Quia quisquam aspernatur ut eligendi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...