Back to make fun of UCLA, the worst top college there is
THIS IS NOT A SHTPOST. So I recently saw something on WSO about UCLA being shtty for finance recruiting, and decided I might as well make a post here to educate everyone about it. As an alum on the east coast who had to grind just as much as a non-target, no name state school kid had to, I feel like I should write a post to well-inform potential incoming students before they end up committing to UCLA. However, note that I was in one of the clubs, so I was still lucky to have mentorship from my upperclassmen.
UCLA, for a school with a 12% acceptance rate and considered the #1 public school and a top 20 school, is actually a complete non-target for investment banking and other high finance careers generally outside of LA, and a semi target for jobs even within the LA area. A lot of EB spots in LA are usually taken up by Ivy kids from the SoCal area. Also each grade at UCLA probably consists of 6500 kids, with probably about 2000 business-interested kids? And in total for kids that breaking into IB/S&T/ER, only about 30-35 kids max a year. UCLA does have IB Workshop and Sharpe Fellows as solid programs for sending kids into IB, and each of these programs takes about 20 kids, with about 90% overlap between the two programs. However, the IB workshop is also run by students, compared to workshops at other universities run by faculty, so a lot of the times, the kids being let in to the workshop are just those with friends from the previous years in the clubs.
Don't even get me started on consulting recruiting. UBS' consulting workshop takes a good amount of kids as well, but only like half of them actually manage to break into consulting. For MBB, UCLA sends about 5 a year, and mid-tier (Parthenon, LEK, Accenture, Deloitte) and low-tier consulting (ZS, KPMG, Mercer), they send about 10-15ish. Also, Deloitte Tech Consulting is not consulting at all, so don't be fooled by that.
Also take into account that 90-95% of those kids that get those top jobs were kids in one of the finance/consulting clubs on campus (there's about 3 legit finance clubs and 4 legit consulting ones? and each has like a 3-4% acceptance rate), so even if they somehow didn't get into Workshop or Sharpe, they still have their alum and upperclassmen showing them the ropes and/or pulling strings for them to break into those top jobs. Oh yeah, speaking about alumni, people tend to tell you to network with other alumni at your school. However, UCLA alumni are actually pretty bad - they would usually only help you out if you were in their club or their frat. I just happened to get lucky and get into a club, but the general finance vibe at UCLA is very toxic. Like one of the finance clubs has been starting to get a reputation for being sexist...
It's just so unfortunate that UCLA does so poorly in high finance and consulting recruiting, but it's a great school for accounting (where most of their business-interested kids end up), which is kind of sad considering how highly ranked of a school it is. This might also be attributed to it being such a research-focused school (which is great for STEM majors). But hey, if you're satisfied going to a back office audit job, UCLA might be the perfect place for you. So being realistic, it's actually incredibly hard getting into IB/Consulting/S&T/ER from UCLA.
You're not just competing with other Econ and Biz Econ majors, but kids from other majors as well (like STEM majors that decided that they wanted to do business), and this is just my anecdotal experience, but STEM majors tend to do much stronger in recruiting. Just take a look at any Engineering or Life Science major that recruited for finance or consulting on Linkedin.
If you are strongly considering UCLA, you probably had a good chance at getting into Cal, UMich, UVA, UNC, Notre Dame, Vandy, GTown as well, so if you did, I would strongly advise you to pick one of those schools instead. For example, UVA is ranked below us with double the acceptance rate, but it sends over 100 kids into high finance careers every year. While we send 35 AT MAX.
It sucks a lot, but if you're at UCLA, and even though you might be incredibly capable, if you're unlucky and don't get into ANY of the 7? clubs or Workshop/Sharpe or happen to be a woman/black/hispanic/native american/queer, I honestly think you're kinda screwed. Just a warning.
+1 SB for the passion
U in BAM?
I'm a UCLA alum & I 100% percent agree. UCLA, given its overall reputation, is awful for finance & consulting careers. The career center (and Econ/Accounting departments in particular) are more than happy sending a couple hundred kids to Big 4 Audit and Tax every year. There is no ambition to pursue higher impact, front office careers. The career center is truly a pile of garbage - everyone there deserves to be fired. Alumni are also lukewarm - if you're in one of the clubs mentioned in the post, you can reliably network with club alums. But if you're not, good luck even getting an email response.
Don't get me wrong, I had a great time there and loved the campus, ease of access to LA life, and all the friends I made. But I would never recommend it to anyone seeking a career in finance or consulting.
Going off that (also a UCLA student), the 'clubs' are the real problem as they serve as a funnel and thus ostracize all those outside of them, or with no interest of joining them. I think because of the high quality of students in those said clubs, recruiters dont look beyond them, apart from those in the STEM subjects. On the note of UCLA only being a semi-target in LA. I think that isnt entirely true. They place well in LA and in SF, but of course not so well in NYC (due to distance, lack of alumni, etc.etc, as well as the fact that many do wish to remain on the east coast). But also UCLA doesnt do terribly in MBB, they do ok. But considering the amount of talent at the school, it does a very poor job. Could be due to the econ/Bus econ majors not actually being good majors, as well as the clubs.
But also note the school is very young. 50 years younger than cal, 30 odd years younger than stanford, 200+ years younger than some east coast schools. The school has already overtaken CAL to be the number one public school, so perhaps over time it may do better in recruiting
Isn't sending only 5 kids to MBB a year pretty bad? UMich sends 20 lmao
My graduating class (early 2010's) had a total of 4 to MBB (3 Bain LA, 1 BCG LA). McKinsey didn't even recruit on campus at UCLA back then (not even a dedicated resume drop on their website).
The infosessions for those companies (and every BB/EB that came to campus) had 100-200 attendees. Like there was literally no space to stand in the back of the room for some of them. That's a pathetic conversion rate. UC Berkeley, UMich, UVA (all of UCLA's closest peers in the public university space) easily send 3x-4x that number to MBB.
I don’t know why everyone here jerks off to UCLA’s acceptance rate. Lower acceptance rate doesn’t equal better recruiting. Penn State’s MBA program has a lower acceptance rate than Wharton. Are you going to turn down Wharton for Penn State Smeal?
Agreed. UCLA's acceptance rate is misleading. If you're applying to any UC school, the application is identical - all you have to do is tick a box and pick a major, so essentially every UC applicant applies to UCLA & UC Berkeley.
It's free for all CA residents to apply, which further boosts the number of applicants. If you look at the acceptance rate for out-of-state students, it's 3x the overall acceptance rate.
UCLA's website says in-state acceptance rate was 12%, out-of-state was 16%, and international was 8% for Fall 2019. I don't know where you're getting the 3x rate from lmao. UC Apps are also $70 or $80 per app. It's only free for poor people.
It is NOT free for all CA residents to apply to the UC's -- more like $70 for each UC that you want to apply to.
This is true, USC generally does much better than UCLA
So basically if you want to go to school in LA and want to do IB/PE then USC is better than UCLA? I see that UCLA is usually ranked slightly higher than USC in most rankings so just need some clarity.
Rankings are trash, they're calculated based on acceptance rates, student faculty ratios, graduation rates, and alumni surveys. The #1 factor above all these statistics should be exit opps. Does this school let me achieve my dreams and get me where I want to be after graduation?
USC knocks out UCLA in recruiting. Trojan investing society is a 25ish person/grade org that publishes member placement. For only those 25 students last year: 4 went to CS NYC, several at JPM SF/LA, (6 people went to JPM in the previous year) several at MS SF, 3 to evercore, I think like 2 people to BofA, 2 at Barclays, 2 at citi, at 4 at Moelis LA/NYC. You can check it out at their website.
While I’m sure this accounts for a large portion of USC IB placement, it’s still only 25 people-these 25 people alone do better than like 8,000 kids a year at UCLA. It’s actually not even competitive to get into Trojan Investment Society if ur in Marshall.
Disclaimer-I go to USC
I don't think I've ever seen a UCLA alumni at a BB/MM/EB that wasn't in one of those clubs or workshop. Must suck to be on the outside of those circles.
Lol - I actually had more luck networking with Anderson alumni than those who came from UCLA undergrad.
Yeah, I've had more help from random cold emailing people than cold emailing people from UCLA. Alumni at other schools have been more willing to push for me than almost any alumni at UCLA.
As someone at a semi-target who networked with 20+ banks and only spoke with alumni, this would blow
I go to one of the other schools mentioned in the post. Reading this really shocked me. The alumni where I go are extremely helpful.
18 SBs and 0 MS. Is it just me or did anyone else expect this post to get a lot of MS? OP even had to start off by saying this wasn't a shitpost because UCLA normally gets lots of love on this site.
I think as of late, UCLA has been getting kinda shitted on the site, so people are realizing how overrated it's really been. The post also brings up really strong points as well, and brings a lot of things into light, like the amount of business kids they have, how highly ranked they are but do so poorly compared to lower-ranked schools, a toxic finance culture, bad alumni, bad career center, etc.
I don't know about that. There was a post a few weeks ago where people were commenting UCLA over UNC KF for the superior brand. The OP of that post even stated he preferred NYC so the commentators there were way wrong.
I agree that OP did a good job of saying UCLA is a prestigious school but for consulting and especially high finance, you'll have a better experience at even strong semi-targets like UNC, Vandy, and Notre Dame where most kids who want IB land gigs and you don't have to apply to clubs with low acceptance rates.
UCLA has sent kids to Qatalyst, KKR, Goldman, etc I wouldnt say it as the 'worst top college there is'
Magnam nesciunt placeat quia aut numquam debitis culpa praesentium. Est nulla reprehenderit facilis laudantium sit ut. Dolorem nam quia excepturi magnam ut. Ipsa inventore ad in qui beatae quas. Rerum cumque et qui repellendus pariatur sit. Rem et minus aliquam est nulla consequatur commodi. Soluta laborum consequatur suscipit qui.
Sapiente deleniti sint enim reprehenderit placeat sint. Ut vero nulla molestias quo quia. Est unde omnis amet et.
Dolorum blanditiis enim autem aperiam vitae. Aliquam consequuntur quae numquam ipsum maiores quia. Expedita dolorem dolorum vel omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Neque magnam rerum quibusdam qui. Alias est vero dignissimos expedita quae repellat. Minima reprehenderit dolorum eos quo. Temporibus hic quis sunt optio ratione illum.