Cambrdige vs LSE economics
Hello, I need help on deciding which masters to do and would like more information before i make the decision. Currently I have been offered MSc Econometrics and Mathematical Economics at LSE and MPHIL Economics at Cambridge. Ideally, I would like to become a quant researcher who uses econometric models to create pricing models. I also like the mathematical side of finance so a role in that field is what I am looking at (also maybe IB to get me into a hedge fund in the first place). I also do not feel like spending 4 more years on PHD. Currently these are my thoughts ( could someone help me correct this if my thinking is flawed) 1) The LSE course is more quantitative and has a much deeper focus on econometrics. The course is much harder and gives me a higher chance to become a quant researcher but it is more geared towards being a pathway for PHD candidates. 2) However, it is tough for me to be a quant without a PHD and I would have to compete against people with a lot more internships and experience than me ( I only have 1 internship at a small fund doing long equities). Therefore, It is very risky to go to the LSE course because I dont think many people outside of academia can tell the difference between EME and regular economics at LSE. 3) Cambridge is more prestigious overall even though the specific course at LSE is safer and would give me a better shot at IBD and other roles in finance and I can work my way to being a quant from there. 4) Cambridge course is better since I can more easily get a distinction for that course compared to the LSE EME which gives like 2 distinctions across 20-30 students (with a high dropout rate) So currently I am leaning towards cambrdige even though I like the LSE course more. As this is a really important decision, any input would be greatly appreciated! Thank you
LSE is much more expensive - you would either have to find a place right in the center of London, or take the tube from somewhere far out (which costs money obviously). Whilst at Cambridge, you would probably live only a few minutes away walking/biking. Should you feel the urge to visit London, Cambridge is only a relatively short train journey away.
If you play a sport, Cambridge definitely has better opportunities for that. Whether it is college sports or university sport, you can meet different people and have fun.
At Cambridge you can enjoy the "Harry Potter" experience and all that nonsense and show off to your friends back home (Americans love that stuff)
The costs and experience differences are minor compared to the major potential impact on my career that this choice could make so I want to focus on what would maximise my chance to get a good job (hopefully as a Quant or working towards one)
Post on econjobrumors
Economics at LSE vs Cambridge (undergraduate) (Originally Posted: 01/20/2018)
I currently have offers from both universities and I would like to pursue a career in investment banking or asset management. I am unsure about whether there is much of a difference in terms of employability and which one would be preferred in the industry. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I did but i think they are geared towards PHDs imo.
Dolores id quia eius laboriosam id nostrum sint. Enim rem amet facilis placeat ducimus illo possimus. Eum sequi quod ut ducimus ipsam eos. Et ut sint aperiam corrupti ea et. Est sint consequatur asperiores ut ea fugit nam facilis. Consequatur aut officia dolore voluptate mollitia.
Possimus sint aliquid velit est nemo corporis. Dolores temporibus ipsum ea odit. Quibusdam labore officia ducimus ipsam eum. Nemo facilis ad cum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...