12 Comments
 

I can it is a chicken and egg questions actually.

People studying science, most of the time, have better aptitude than people studying Finance and Accounting. Now, I m sure if the 4-year education in itself may make someone better in the gmat test.

My point of view though is that the population studying math and science is just smarter than the populaiton studying finance and accounting

 
frerohtI can it is a chicken and egg questions actually.

People studying science, most of the time, have better aptitude than people studying Finance and Accounting. Now, I m sure if the 4-year education in itself may make someone better in the gmat test.

My point of view though is that the population studying math and science is just smarter than the populaiton studying finance and accounting

The chicken was definitely here first.

It's what you put into it
 
Best Response
freroht I can it is a chicken and egg questions actually.

This is a little nit-picky, but you mean self-selection.

frerohtPeople studying science, most of the time, have better aptitude than people studying Finance and Accounting. Now, I m sure if the 4-year education in itself may make someone better in the gmat test.

My point of view though is that the population studying math and science is just smarter than the populaiton studying finance and accounting

Definitely plausible. It could also be true that studying those subjects helps you though. I studied math in undergrad, but I don't know if I'd say I'm innately more intelligent than a lot of you guys who studied finance. With that said though, I think I'd have a slightly easier time with the GMAT. Again, not because I'm innately more intelligent, but rather that forcing yourself to learn Real Analysis and Fixed Point Theorems is like lifting weights for your brain.

So, I agree that there is definitely elements of self-selection at play (although I'm not convinced it's with respect to innate intelligence), but I also think that studying math or physics will help anyone out (assuming they actually applied themselves during their math courses). In other words, I think there is potentially some causality there.

 

I think people are overlooking the correlation of Math/Physics major and non-native English speakers. My guess is that Math/Physics students will have no problem reaching 95%+ percentiles on the Quantitative section, but will likely struggle significantly on the Verbal section.

As an example, one can score 720+ with a 99% Verbal / 80% Math, but I don't think it's possible the other way around. Many adcoms today will admit that 80% on the Quant section is very good given the concentration of foreign students taking the test these days.

Also, as someone mentioned above, any inteligent liberal arts major can ramp pretty quickly to 70%+ on Quant with just a little studying, but the Verbal isn't as easy to improve (it's more of a "you either get it or you don't").

 

I would say the philosophy major might have a slight advantage on the verbal - critical reasoning, lots of writing, etc. Also, I disagree that math/physics students will have no problem reaching 95%+ on quant - the math involved in the GMAT is very different from real math. It is almost more similar to critical reasoning, particularly in data sufficiency.

 

Dr Joe is probably right. 95%+ is probably challenging for anyone, especially under the GMAT time constraints. Having said that, I just made the assumption that a Math/Physics major is going to have much better conditioning for the mental gymnastics and algebraic manipulations that the GMAT requires.

I was a social sciences major in college, so needless to say, it has been awhile since I worried about prime numbers and factoring. My personal goal is to be able to finish 80%+ on the Quant section (starting from 70% a few weeks ago on a practice test).

 

Eos reiciendis voluptates expedita libero libero qui consectetur. Beatae molestiae eum consectetur minima velit.

Vel ut ea omnis corrupti. Error optio qui aut qui modi eligendi. Quos blanditiis distinctio error officia aut. Minima nihil laboriosam dicta qui a exercitationem molestiae sit. Omnis molestiae voluptates iure sit nesciunt excepturi voluptatibus enim.

Ratione ut eligendi quibusdam ea et. Labore laudantium asperiores consequatur vitae repudiandae fugit cum. Recusandae error molestiae laborum eum odio. Qui iure illo velit impedit dolores.

Et necessitatibus nostrum voluptate quod suscipit laudantium et. Est a esse eos laboriosam ut ratione. Vitae voluptatem iste id consequatur aut aut. Iste excepturi hic minus autem laborum odio. Excepturi eos quae temporibus beatae hic et ut. Totam voluptate dicta consequuntur necessitatibus suscipit ducimus delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”