Is it EASIER to Break In From A Big Business School than an IVY?

So I'm obviously aware of the hierarchy of target schools but when I look at LinkedIn I consistently see McCombs, Ross, and Stern feeding into top EB's and BB's. There is obviously a degree of self-selection (i.e, people at those schools have a greater interest in banking) and size is a factor, but if we were to look at simply how EASY it is to get a BB or EB role, is it easier coming from a mid-ivy (brown,dartmouth,penn) or a top business school (excluding Wharton and Dyson)?

Clubs are a huge part of this as well. I see UVA AIF and McCombs Wall Street Track placing  lights out - but these are incredibly hard to get in. I feel like I barely see people from the ivy league going into banking and even MF PE compared to those schools. Is top finance talent just not pursuing banking anymore and looking for strictly Bx, Apollo, KKR, and HF? 

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, breaking into top investment banking roles (BBs and EBs) from a big business school like McCombs, Ross, or Stern can sometimes appear "easier" than from a mid-Ivy (e.g., Brown, Dartmouth, Penn), but the reality is nuanced. Here's the breakdown:

1. Pipeline and Size Advantage

  • Big business schools like McCombs, Ross, and Stern have larger student bodies and more structured finance pipelines. Programs like UVA AIF and McCombs Wall Street Track are specifically designed to funnel students into top finance roles, making the process more streamlined.
  • These schools also have a higher concentration of students actively pursuing banking, which creates a stronger network and more alumni representation at BBs and EBs.

2. Clubs and Resources

  • Clubs like UVA AIF and McCombs Wall Street Track are indeed highly competitive, but they provide unparalleled preparation and networking opportunities. These clubs often mimic the intensity of the recruiting process, giving students a significant edge.
  • Mid-Ivies may lack the same level of structured finance clubs, which can make the process feel less accessible unless students are proactive.

3. Self-Selection and Interest

  • At mid-Ivies, many top students may opt for other prestigious paths like consulting, tech, or direct-to-MF PE/HF roles, which can dilute the number of students targeting banking. In contrast, business schools often attract students with a clear focus on finance, creating a more concentrated pool of candidates.

4. Recruiter Perception

  • While mid-Ivies carry strong brand recognition, recruiters at BBs and EBs often value the practical, finance-focused training and alumni networks of top business schools. This can make it feel "easier" to break in from a business school, especially if you're leveraging alumni connections.

5. Is Top Finance Talent Avoiding Banking?

  • There is some truth to the idea that top finance talent is increasingly targeting direct-to-MF PE, HFs, or even tech roles. However, banking remains a popular stepping stone, and the competition is still fierce. The perception of fewer Ivy students in banking may stem from their broader career interests rather than a lack of opportunities.

Conclusion:

If you're comparing "ease," big business schools with structured finance pipelines and strong alumni networks (e.g., McCombs, Ross, Stern) may offer a more straightforward path to BBs and EBs. However, mid-Ivies still provide excellent opportunities, especially for students who are proactive and leverage their networks effectively. Ultimately, success depends on your individual effort, networking, and preparation, regardless of the school.

Sources: Accounting vs Finance: Part 1 – Career Paths, Is investment banking not as prestigious as most people think? Are kids that break in sub-par?, Is investment banking not as prestigious as most people think? Are kids that break in sub-par?, IU Kelley Prestige, Breaking into Banking is NOT Like Applying to College

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Ullam illum consectetur nihil non et. Rerum a ratione enim exercitationem quaerat et provident rem. Ut impedit dolor dolor quisquam enim sed voluptas. Sequi sit sint ex voluptate id. Porro aperiam iusto ipsa numquam nisi. Voluptatem sunt aut omnis ea aut tenetur.

Doloribus beatae culpa dicta aut. Voluptate consectetur alias cum ipsa culpa laboriosam quasi. Eaque sint enim praesentium quo cupiditate soluta veniam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”