LSE Vs Cambridge
deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted
Trending Content - Business School and GMAT Forum
| +14 | MSc Finance Profile Evaluation | 3 | 1d |
| Would you choose YPSM or Oxbridge? | 6 | 3d | |
| +9 | Recruiting for Impact / Green Energy / Renewable Infa during MBA | 0 | 10h |
| +6 | EOR or other programs at EUR/RSM | 2 | 4d |
| +6 | Harvard or Cambridge? | 10 | 2h |
| +3 | LBS MiF | 1 | 3d |
Career Resources
Cambridge if money is an issue. Otherwise LSE has the edge
.
Take cambridge without a doubt
.
I'm surprised you could say Cambridge, because surely for finance: - MSc Economic History is more relevant than MPhil Architecture and Urban Studies (unless you want to go towards Real Estate I suppose) - LSE > Cambridge - London > Cambridge
And whilst I personally would love to study in Cambridge for a year, I don't see how it's better in this situation. Can someone explain?
Exactly, this is the point! +1
go for the curriculum and not for the prestige as both universities are top notch. yes, cambridge is more well-known in the world but the LSE (finance) network is greater, and most of the analysts are actually from LSE (c. 30%).
also, both student lifes are very different: cambridge with its college systems and LSE as a cosmopolitan city-
.
.
.
.
We've spoken before but i'm a current lse student doing econ history
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Quibusdam enim modi nesciunt. Ea pariatur occaecati sed natus. Aut sit voluptatem consectetur dolores voluptates quas. A minus voluptas voluptatem dolorem voluptatem tenetur perferendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...