Warwick Vs Cass Vs Cranfield MSc Management
I' am From India and have received offers from above programs. My deadlines are soon approaching so any information regarding which business school should I join of the above would be really helpful. Some background:
I' am currently in my final year of Electronics engineering. My main aim is stream conversion from technical to a more people centric stream such as management. My interest lies in consultancy, investment banking and marketing. Can anyone help me in selecting any one from the above programs? From what I have heard so far, I have received two types of advises :
1) Being from India and that too without any work experience, it would be extremely difficult for me to find a job after completing my masters in the UK hence a program which offers internship would be highly valuable. I've been getting advises to join Cranfield because it has a dedicated 3 months internship in the course and also their international mobility stats are higher.
2) The second advise I get the most is to join Warwick because of it's immense reputation. The fact that it is so well known around the world would open lots of opportunities. Also, if in case I don't land a job in UK and would have to return back to India, Warwick brand would be a safe bet to get me a decent job to pay off my loans.
3) I haven't got any satisfactory reviews to join Cass.
I know that getting a job is a very subjective and depends on the person more than the University but still want to know your perspective.
Hi Aniket-K, any of these threads helpful:
Calling relevant pros to the rescue! dollarstrong Erik-Schneiman Big_Red
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
At this point of time I' am most probably inclined on Warwick and Cranfield and have disregarded Cass. So my decision is between Warwick vs Cranfield. While Warwick's Mim overall ranking is far better than Cranfield's(21 vs 49), there are some aspects of the ranking i.e international mobility where Cranfield ranks far higher. But then Warwick ranks 2nd in career progress. These are some features of the FT rankings which are giving me selection headache. I'm a little bit more inclined towards Cranfield as it provides 3 months internship. Also, it's course structure seems comprehensive. On the other hand, Warwick's website has very less course information, and i'm struggling to get information from their alumni and faculty. Can you help me decide between Cranfield and Warwick on the basis of the information I have provided about myself and my research?
Lol discarding Cass that actually has one of the best BS brand in the UK in order to apply at Cranfield's BS sounds hilarious
You are correct, but postgraduate only.
Cranfield is very good at very specific things like aerospace engineering (they have their own airport) and are known as a school with a large military and ex-military population. In fact, I believe they used to be owned by HM Forces.
Est rem eum perferendis et placeat cupiditate exercitationem. Sunt ut nihil rerum id laudantium consequatur. Aut suscipit tempore odit delectus.
Iusto blanditiis et dolor sint quis blanditiis. Sed dolores repellendus iusto deleniti omnis non. Odit non et et molestias porro consequatur. Sunt ut voluptas tempore omnis. Voluptas in eaque necessitatibus neque quidem repellat est. Magnam id voluptatibus enim voluptatem rerum non magni.
Non porro adipisci quo ipsum occaecati porro et aliquid. Eligendi quo at repudiandae quo fugiat perspiciatis. Totam alias architecto et similique adipisci nulla. Doloribus asperiores eum illo magni esse.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...