13 Comments
 

I'm at one now and can confirm this seems to be true, at least at mine

You definitely see more representation from good undergrads, but I think that's more a function of those schools placing into better jobs pre-MBA than the MBA program caring. It doesn't hurt but if you go to SUNY and work at a solid job and do well you aren't at that much of a disadvantage vs someone in the same job from a better (non-Ivy) school like Michigan / Duke / etc (holding GPA, GMAT, etc equal)

family is everything
 

All the M7 people I know personally were at T30 schools or better. T10-T15 is where I saw more variability. Currently at a T20-T25 MBA school and we have probably like 10-20 people from T30 undergrads. Rest is fairly variable. I only know of one whose from a top Ivy like HYP whose a 2nd year. 1st years also has a few Ivy undergrads.

I went to a complete non-target undergrad.

 

It's more difficult probably to get offers at lower ranked schools but I've seen it happen in the US. Not sure about Canada and these instances are very rare.

At a T20-T25, we recruit fairly well into a good chunk of MM banks (we historically place in some BBs but it's not common, recently got a few EB hires but those are still considered very uncommon historically at our school).

 

I went to H/S and was honestly shocked by how many people DIDN’T go to good schools. It was really only some of the PE guys and MBB consultants who had Ivy League backgrounds. I would say only 25% of a class went to Ivies. Increases to maybe 50% of the class for T30 schools (which includes more than 30 schools given subjectivity). There were plenty of people who went to schools abroad, state schools and LACs I have personally never heard of.

 

I look at undergrad prestige as a nice backup if you have a low GPA or if you didn't get a good job out of undergrad. Definitely plenty of non targets at every MBA program in the M7. Nontarget + low GPA (less than 3.4) would be very difficult to overcome though unless you perform well above the GMAT average and have A+ work experience, the latter of which is pretty unlikely given you're already coming from a non target and have a low gpa. 

 
Most Helpful

people like to imagine that M7s are full of super high achiever Ivy League types, but the reality is that the modal outcome even at HBS (maybe not Stanford) is an MBB consulting job

now, that's a good job in the scheme of things, but if you're defining a "super high achiever" as someone with a top tier job out of undergrad, and maybe a promotion/step up within that path, would an MBB consulting job really be that desirable? for the most part, someone who did IB + PE 2+2, or MBB, or FAANG PM, out of undergrad, is not going to need/want to invest 200k+ 2 years into getting there, because they already have that level of career capital

therefore, most people going into M7 are going to have sub-MBB level careers, and looking to get onto a path like IB, MBB, or amazon PM

again, Stanford has a different proposition, but if we are talking about the "bottom half" M7s, and frankly most of the non-PE/sponsored people at harvard/wharton too, this is true

 

It's really GSB and everyone else these days, with H/W a half step above the others imo.

 

Maxime laborum atque quae soluta voluptatem eaque. Distinctio dolor perferendis in hic velit. Inventore quis et quibusdam commodi debitis delectus aut. At unde dolorem harum repellat eos ut ut.

Aut ex nobis quis et inventore molestiae perspiciatis. Quasi eius dolor sit odit nulla voluptas. Aperiam iure exercitationem reprehenderit ullam. Dolorum qui sint ex neque rerum voluptate aspernatur.

Iste hic accusantium qui minima quae. Dolor sapiente molestiae quas neque. Possimus deleniti quasi aut. Quisquam consequatur quibusdam sunt perspiciatis consequatur ipsam. Tempora tempore voluptatem in sapiente laboriosam temporibus omnis.

Odit dolores consequatur neque quidem soluta eius accusamus. Iste suscipit sit et quasi cupiditate neque quod voluptas. Aut mollitia culpa beatae animi exercitationem earum omnis. Fuga sit quis cumque illo quis quidem ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”