My friend and I were arguing about the difference in GPAs. He said that if two candidates were pretty much the same except one had a 3.9 and the other had a 4.0, the 4.0 would always get the job over the 3.9 even if the 3.9 was more interesting and appealing to the interviewer. I completely disagreed - I think that at that level, the difference in GPA is negligible and fit takes over.
What do you think?
I think your friend is an idiot.
Word.
your friend clearly doesn't have any experience in the real world
what a douche
You shouldn't argue with friends.
Looks like your friend may be unemployed for a while because he clearly doesn't get it.
If one surrounds themselves with funny friends he seems funny....
Why would you guys talk about this when there are literally 9 million more interesting things to discuss. Sometimes its better to just let people believe what they want because there is no chance you will change their mind and trying to is a waste of time.
Agreed that this is a really silly way of looking at it. Fit/experience/etc is much more important than a 0.1 point bump in GPA, especially at that level.
ermm.... i guess i would go with the 4.0 if it was ALL ELSE EQUAL (like identical twins with the exact same ECs, hobbies, and personality). But that 0.1 GPA difference means very little if compared to other factors... honestly I'd go with the guy I liked better at that point.
That's interesting because my friend and I were arguing about the difference in penises. He said that if two candidates were pretty much the same except one had a 3.9" penis and the other had a 4.0" penis, the 4.0" would always get the girl over the 3.9" even if the 3.9" was more interesting and appealing to the girl. I completely disagreed - I think that at that level, the difference in penis is negligible and fit takes over.
What do you think?
flaccid?
You seem to be awfully obsessed with penises. Hardly any post recently without a reference to them. What are you trying to tell us MBP?
I don't think your 'friend' exists r.
your friend is a fucking tool and you are a tool for humoring him.
I'd go for a 3.2 with sports involvement over a 4.0 math machine. Nobody wants a finance robot. We're looking for well-rounded applicants.
This...
i would go for the one that is better to look at
stupid argument..
your friend is an idiot.. I have seen an SA in a group in my office get hired for FT with a 3.0 and sports over another SA who had a 4.0 and a triple major.
You and your friend need to get laid.
Is the difference in pen--err---GPA really .1? Because if one candidate was "more interesting and appealing to the interviewer" this seems like a stupid question.
I was arguing with my friend the other day that the color red is soo much better than blue because it is pleasing to me but they said blue is better b/c it brings out their eyes...can you reinforce that he's retarded b/c he doesn't agree about something mundane and fucking retarded???
Make new friends..
completely agree. Your friend is ot worth having...if something so retarded caused you to have an arguement
is your "friend", you?
Animi ratione unde numquam sequi ad. Ut deleniti natus distinctio et. Aspernatur et velit ut animi.
Ad et nihil dolorum sit. Aut commodi quibusdam id sunt. Error minus quod nulla ea repudiandae laborum. Perspiciatis possimus labore fuga dolor aut repudiandae. Ipsam ut repellendus velit adipisci ut quis qui. Quia voluptate autem sed et et quas.
Eos blanditiis illo quo non ut ut. Sed fugiat ab nihil repellat. Cum quod sit vel dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Velit natus doloremque sit sunt. Est nesciunt consequuntur accusantium. Et voluptas ut officia illum. Consequuntur voluptatem rerum quisquam sit omnis.
Dignissimos quia ex sunt fugiat. Cupiditate suscipit et molestiae dolorem perspiciatis id adipisci.