China Data - What is it telling us?

On Friday, for the first time on record (and likely 4 decades+), China's economy contracted a whopping 6.8% y/y in the first quarter. Spending some time thinking through this, I have a few thoughts and would be interested to see if others have any feelings or ideas, as we try and move through this incredibly complex environment. This data was (by my observation) largely ignored and overshadowed by the outcome of the unofficial Gilead trial which came out on Thursday night and the plan for "reopening the economy" that was also announced. It actually amazed me how little time was actually devoted to dissecting the data, given the magnitude of this drop.

China's economy dropped by this much, and they really only completely shut down one province (to the best of my understanding), rather than the entire country like here in the US. Given that China is being seen as the blueprint for re-opening, I think looking at the data makes a lot of sense. The two figures that interest me the most, and in my mind point to a much longer economic recovery than one may think, is the relationship between the industrial production figure and the retail spending figure. Industrial production improved significantly in March, with only a 1% drop, compared with 13% in January and February. To me, at a very high level, this would imply that by and large, China is back to work. This is all in, a pretty positive sign, albeit pretty shocking, but they did to a great job in containing it and the lockdown was largely focused on the Wuhan Province.

That said, even with people being "back to work," they still are not spending. Retail sales were still down 16%, only slightly better than the 20% fall in January and February. To me, this would imply what some of the more bearish views on the street are saying, that even when we manage to re-open the economy, consumer spending is not going to get back to pre-COVID levels anytime soon, and for a country that's 70% consumer driven, I don't view that as an overly positive sign of things to come in coming quarters. Exacerbating the problem is that the US shutdown, and US layoffs, have been nationwide, not largely contained...


The Social Network For Smart Money Investors

  • Commonstock built a platform to showcase the portfolios, real-time trades, and analysis of the smartest retail investors, helping you distinguish signal from noise. 
  • From equities and options to crypto and NFT's, markets are changing fast. It's more important than ever to find trustworthy information. 

Comments (2)

  • Analyst 3+ in HF - EquityHedge
Apr 22, 2020 - 11:51pm

Not clear what you are looking for? I think the biggest risks at this point are not economic. Also, China actually had stringent lockdowns which have slowly been unwound in other provinces too. This means that everyone is on edge and social interactions are minimized so the tepid recovery in retail is expected. That will take at least 3 months for the news cycle to swing from portraying this as an end-of-world pandemic to this is something that we now understand better and have sufficient test/trace/isolate process to keep in check regardless of new treatments. That last point is very important, Western media hasn't concentrated on China due to political sensitivities but their ability to test and trace is very well-disciplined and extremely effective. I would say its on par with South Korea, and more impressive considering the larger geographic size and population. USA has not had anywhere near the hard lockdowns we saw in Wuhan.

Even in China, the layoffs have been nationwide so its not completely different. The greater concern is whether the heated rhetoric actually leads to action as everyone is brandishing nationalism and urging self-sufficiency for medical supply lines. You see the hawks in Washington who are already hammering away. This is the greatest danger moving forward. If this diplomatic friction doesn't cool the fallout will be far worse than this virus.

Most Helpful
Apr 24, 2020 - 8:38am
Billy Ray Valentine, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Libero rerum impedit sunt dolores quos ut. Iure possimus minima a ex omnis et.

Ab numquam cumque repellat aliquam ut totam consectetur ut. Repellat saepe iusto quia ut. Quam et autem non et aut harum accusamus. Porro placeat dolorum voluptate rerum. Aspernatur rerum rerum ut. Voluptas veritatis et ipsam velit labore id.

Quasi voluptas tempore repellat mollitia possimus eum. Alias voluptas nisi debitis et eaque reprehenderit vero.

Non rerum non a sed. Amet dicta ipsam vel fugiat neque pariatur sint. Porro vitae eos minus quo quas rem. Fuga sunt impedit optio optio consectetur officia animi. Eos ratione tenetur quisquam cum est enim autem.

Start Discussion

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2022 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company (▲03) 99.6%
  • Lincoln International (= =) 99.2%
  • RBC Capital Markets (▲07) 98.8%
  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch (▲01) 98.4%
  • Houlihan Lokey (▲06) 98.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2022 Investment Banking

  • Lincoln International (▲06) 99.6%
  • Jefferies & Company (▲11) 99.2%
  • Greenhill (▲07) 98.8%
  • Rothschild (▲01) 98.4%
  • Evercore (▽01) 98.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2022 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company (▲04) 99.6%
  • Lincoln International (▲04) 99.2%
  • RBC Capital Markets (▲09) 98.8%
  • Houlihan Lokey (▲07) 98.4%
  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch (▲04) 98.0%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2022 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (9) $661
  • Vice President (37) $394
  • Associates (191) $246
  • 2nd Year Analyst (117) $162
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (17) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (369) $150
  • Intern/Summer Associate (78) $147
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (292) $92