Convention for butterfly trades

Hi All,

A newbie question: what is the market convention while qouting and trading butterfly spreads?

This link mentions 4 calls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_(options)

and this mentions a strangle + straddle combination:
http://www.riskglossary.com/link/options_spread.htm

I know because of put-call parity either one will give the same payoff, but generally in the market how is a butterfly priced/treated?

Do you consider both calls & puts (i.e. straddle/strangle combo) or only look at just calls as Wikipedia says.

I will include the standard disclaimer that I am very new to this, so please bear with me if this is very basic.

-Steve

4 Comments
 

The traditional textbook butterfly has the strangle notional as two times that of the straddle notional - hence the pay off diagrams are flat once the underlying moves past one of the strangle strikes (if you purchase the butterfly you refer to the strangle/the 'wings'). However, in the broker market butterflies are actually traded as such: - The strangle vol is computed by finding the 25d put and call vols and then solving for the same implied vol that keeps the total premium unchanged (typically puts trade over calls (the 'skew'). This is the broker strangle, as opposed to the smiled strangle which is just the arithmetic vol average of the 25d put and call. - The notionals of the strangle are chosen such that the butterfly is vega-neutral so the notional of the wings is more than 2x that of the ATM, making the payoff diagram a W shape instead.

 
Best Response

He's looking at it from the FX perspective, so everything traded in the broker market is a market strangle. They are always done B-S vega neutral Strangle vs Straddle (so in reality there is a vega on it when considering the smile, you can do it smile vega neutral, but it's not super common). Convention on anything vega-neutral is to say # of option 1 by vega equivalent of option 2. Flies are DNS by vega equivalent of the strangle. So if you bought the butterfly in 100/v, you would sell 50 a/l of DNS and by vega equiv strangle.

Keep in mind when you trade a market strangle, you use a common vol to solve for the strikes you will actually trade. As such, even if you trade a 10d butterfly, the strikes you actually trade are unlikely to actually be 10d on smile (read with skew).

They are quoted as Common vol strangle - DNS vol (or ATMF for long dated). So if you bought USDCAD 1y 10d strangle at .9, you then agree an atm vol (let's say 6.6), so the strangle common vol will be 6.6+.9 = 7.5 which will then be used to plug into B-S to get the strikes.

Bonus questions: Why do you need to agree a vol? How does it impact your trade? If you bought the fly, likely what do you want the vol to be, high or low?

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Voluptatem vel incidunt voluptas perferendis. Qui expedita aut dolor et et illum. Excepturi culpa sint officia rerum rerum iure et id. Aspernatur eos fugiat asperiores officiis cum quisquam. Et aut maiores facere nostrum.

Dolorem saepe molestias assumenda accusantium aut sint aliquid. Unde commodi magni consequatur animi dolores praesentium. Consequatur perspiciatis aperiam tempora culpa ratione quia commodi maxime. Est velit dolorem deleniti aut sed fugit. Enim soluta temporibus tenetur excepturi.

Voluptate nesciunt similique cumque. Excepturi qui mollitia dolor recusandae in natus recusandae. Dolores ea omnis repellendus doloremque eligendi. Numquam veniam modi voluptate ut. Earum illo dolores possimus fugit itaque. Placeat nemo officiis repellat nostrum.

Optio qui et dolorem exercitationem in officia at est. Et facere fuga iure quia et est. Voluptatum reprehenderit omnis odit dicta occaecati corrupti reprehenderit. Rerum voluptas eos quam corrupti enim mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”