Goldman quantitative investment strategies vs prop trading
I am a junior at a target school. I have been offered a summer position with Goldman quantitative investment strategies (Asset Management) as well as a summer internship doing prop trading at a firm in Chicago (think belvedere / wolverine / drw level) . I really don't know much about finance, more of a math and programming guy, but both positions seem interesting. Anyone have advice on differences that I should consider? I'm having trouble contextualizing the positions in terms of full time recruiting next year, mobility, and payment over time during career. Really appreciate any advice!
regardless of your choice, you wont be able to learn anything significant during 2-3 months. Also both will be hard to get a ft offer, not BC you are not good enough but BC the industry is dying. So if i were you i would choose Goldman just bc you can say you interned at Goldman- in this way, you can apply to pretty much everywhere. And if you are super math/programming guy, you will not enjoy finance/make a lot of money eventually - bc 10 yrs from now some liberal arts major kids will make 10times more than you do (Ibankers, "human" traders, sales, etc) quant types make more at first but in the long run people who understand the markets (most of time quants NEVER understand) win. I have a background in engineering+financial engineering, and now im a derivatives trader. And trust me, if you dont know about finance(finance is not BS options theory, btw), you willl be wasting your time+talent.
Hah the previous poster seems pretty pessimistic. Since I'm neither pessimistic nor optimistic (I don't really care that much about the future - live in the present), I'll try to provide food for thought in near-term.
Ideally, the internship will give you some perspective on whether finance (specifically trading/AM) is an area you'd like. Most likely, coworkers will either teach you the finance, or you'll learn it yourself (or be asked to do so). I think it's healthy to stay open-minded - not knowing jack shit about finance going in is probably okay, but if there isn't sufficient motivation to learn it's probably not going to work out. Even if you find the internship dull, it doesn't mean you should reject finance completely. Maybe half your summer is spent on a a particular task within a proprietary asset allocation method or optimization technique - the only failure here perhaps would be not viewing your work under the appropriate scope.
Myriad of differences between 2 positions. At GS you'll be working in a much larger organization, and there will be opportunities to learn about various divisions within the firm, of which QIS is a small part. On the contrary, prop firms are relatively small and tight-knit, my guess is groups are likely either broken up by strategy or product. The organizational structure of the prop firm would appear much different. Just comparing QIS with a prop firm, you also have different business models. QIS last I checked is still very client focused, whereas at a prop firm you're trading with the firm's capital. Implicit in this is regardless of your role within QIS, thinking in terms of what the client wants is probably important, whereas in prop that's not a concern.
FT recruiting - so yes GS is obviously well-known, but so are some of the more established prop firms. GS name will probably help, but really at the margin I suspect. Like if you submit a resume for banking, automated systems aren't likely to rule you out because of NOT GS and any person looking at your resume will probably come to conclusion "man this dude seems kinda technical", regardless of internship. In the trading/AM arena, I don't necessarily see one giving an edge over the other either.
Mobility/payment over time of career. Again, I don't think one choice vs. other will really give you an edge here. I mean it's possible you go to the prop firm and absolutely hate it. Does that mean in hindsight GS would've been the right choice? Possible but it probably wouldn't matter much. Remember you haven't even started working nor have you finished school yet. Reason you may have trouble contextualizing positions is because for many the first internship doesn't really decide or define rest of one's career.
Voluptatem et rerum animi odio quibusdam nostrum. Culpa architecto ipsam earum quo qui. Molestiae commodi reprehenderit eum laboriosam cumque. Reprehenderit id est itaque dolores. Id omnis tempore omnis rerum adipisci consequuntur.
Ipsa adipisci aut dolorem quia quis in. Quasi cum quia magni accusantium animi commodi dolores. Voluptatem ea harum laboriosam officiis dolores quasi fugiat.
Minima recusandae unde dolor autem mollitia earum placeat. Quas dolor cumque voluptas non numquam. Exercitationem soluta deserunt officia occaecati alias est. Accusantium consequatur voluptate voluptas ea. Eligendi quo omnis quam dicta.
Enim sit necessitatibus eius voluptatibus. Itaque vel molestiae labore dicta. Numquam et reiciendis velit dolorem ut necessitatibus optio. Delectus ex quis quia excepturi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...