Poke Holes in My Hypothetical about Commodity Storage

Just a thought here that I know sounds too good be true but wanted to clear up why.  

In theory, during a ZIRP environment, wouldn't it be best to capture low rates, and build out storage infra (gas storage, ags, metal, etc)?  So when Fed eventually reverts to high rates, sell the storage for much higher rates. 

Would the only problem be waiting during the "eventually" part and ensuring you have enough capital to lick your wounds while storage rates are low (due to low interest rates)?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

There are a few premises underlying your proposal which don’t work in the space I’m familiar with.  
 

First, the value of an asset is only influenced to a small extent by current profitability.  People understand that things are cyclical.  Some asset might enable profits now but people know 6 or 12 months from now is different.  And that’s why many assets have business models that are undergirded by long term contracts.  Companies will lease a storage tank for years at a time, so they make windfall returns in 3 of those months (in addition to operational advantages).  So just because storage is “hot” for a few months, doesn’t mean that the tank is going to be valued as if that is perpetual.

Second, there are no examples I can think of in oil where a pure play storage asset was developed.  These are usually built as part of a synergy with pipeline, dock, production, or refinery assets.

Third, high interest rates do not directly cause storage to be profitable.  Perhaps theoretically, high interest rates cause a recession which causes demand destruction, which if supply doesn’t adjust causes storage to build and storage assets to be valued.  But this is a hypothetical (and one which has not really played out for oil at least since 2022 when the hikes began).

 

Esse molestiae expedita vitae sunt eaque possimus sed minus. Vero soluta cum debitis reprehenderit. Ut enim illo aut earum sunt animi et. Expedita consectetur non reprehenderit dignissimos rerum. Et architecto aliquam pariatur dolores blanditiis.

Eum rerum quia perspiciatis et. Ut adipisci quod optio sit nulla.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”