Poke Holes in My Hypothetical about Commodity Storage

Just a thought here that I know sounds too good be true but wanted to clear up why.  

In theory, during a ZIRP environment, wouldn't it be best to capture low rates, and build out storage infra (gas storage, ags, metal, etc)?  So when Fed eventually reverts to high rates, sell the storage for much higher rates. 

Would the only problem be waiting during the "eventually" part and ensuring you have enough capital to lick your wounds while storage rates are low (due to low interest rates)?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

There are a few premises underlying your proposal which don’t work in the space I’m familiar with.  
 

First, the value of an asset is only influenced to a small extent by current profitability.  People understand that things are cyclical.  Some asset might enable profits now but people know 6 or 12 months from now is different.  And that’s why many assets have business models that are undergirded by long term contracts.  Companies will lease a storage tank for years at a time, so they make windfall returns in 3 of those months (in addition to operational advantages).  So just because storage is “hot” for a few months, doesn’t mean that the tank is going to be valued as if that is perpetual.

Second, there are no examples I can think of in oil where a pure play storage asset was developed.  These are usually built as part of a synergy with pipeline, dock, production, or refinery assets.

Third, high interest rates do not directly cause storage to be profitable.  Perhaps theoretically, high interest rates cause a recession which causes demand destruction, which if supply doesn’t adjust causes storage to build and storage assets to be valued.  But this is a hypothetical (and one which has not really played out for oil at least since 2022 when the hikes began).

 

Quia aut tempora provident voluptas. Est voluptas ex quia modi iusto nihil corporis consectetur. Praesentium et sit ut odio. Voluptas quaerat eum explicabo. Sunt at illo totam sunt adipisci commodi omnis alias. Aut sequi sapiente totam minus ut nisi recusandae.

Velit assumenda hic optio sunt eos. Ipsam animi maxime neque quisquam et cum saepe. Reprehenderit delectus error molestias qui perspiciatis. Distinctio molestiae accusantium suscipit dignissimos.

Perspiciatis omnis consectetur aliquid molestias distinctio sed. Dolorem doloribus fuga a officiis. Qui incidunt ut eum non saepe.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”