Incoterms - Glencore/Trafigura Interview Prep

Just wanted to clarify my understanding on the following incoterms: FOB (Destination), CFR/CIF, DAP. 

FOB (Destination): The seller undertakes all transportation costs, damage/risks associated with goods (until port of destination), and handles export clearance. Once the goods arrive and are unloaded at port, transfer of ownership is conferred to buyer who then handles the respective risks and costs of the goods until their final destination (includes import clearance). 

CFR/CIF: Seller - like FOB destination - is liable for transportation costs and export clearance but the transfer of risks/damages in-transit falls on the buyer as soon as the goods are loaded on to the transport. Title transfer occurs with goods being unloaded at buyer's port. (CIF is basically CFR but involves the seller also incurring minimum insurance costs for the goods in-transit).

DAP: Seller bears all transportation costs, damage/risks, and handles export clearance. Title transfer occurs when the goods are ready for unloading at the agreed location where this can be at the buyer's port, terminal, or warehouse. Any further freight costs incurred beyond the port to the buyer's warehouse, for instance, are to be covered by the seller. Buyer then assumes all risk and costs (including import costs). 

I pieced this information from a few online sources but wanted to make sure the specifics are right. Would this be an accurate understanding of these incoterms? Thanks!

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

FOB:

Seller deals with export formalities, places the goods on board the vessel, but gives no guarantee that the goods will arrive at destination.

Buyer arranges a contract of carriage, insures the goods (or chooses not to), discharge at destination at their time/risk/expense, deals with import matters

Risk transfers from seller to buyer as the goods are loaded on board. 

CFR:

Seller deals with export formalities, arranges a suitable contract of carriage, places the goods on board the vessel, makes sure that the goods arrive at destination.

Buyer insures the goods, discharge at destination at their time/risk/expense, deals with import matters.

Risk transfers from seller to buyer as the goods are loaded on board.

Under CIF, the seller must insure the goods. Usually the buyer will make additional insurance arrangements

DAP:

Seller is basically responsible for export/loading/carriage/insurance/unloading plus having the goods delivered but not unloaded at the named place of destination

Risk transfers from seller to buyer as the goods are unloaded at the named place.

 

Thank you for your detailed response. I just want to ask a couple of follow-up questions: 

- What I tried to outline in my original post was FOB destination and your description seems to fall in line with FOB shipping point / origin (https://www.bdc.ca/en/articles-tools/entrepreneur-toolkit/templates-bus…). For FOB, is FOB origin just way more commonplace and, thus, the standard description? I assume this would be the general answer to give in interviews. 

- From my understanding, as per the Deloitte excerpt below, DAP does not involve the seller covering import clearance or unloading costs as the goods are the buyer's responsibility once they are ready for unloading at the agreed location. DDP would see the seller cover all the costs you mentioned as the seller covers essentially all costs, risk, and duties. Am I wrong in this? 

Any help would be appreciated! Thank you!Deloitte

 

- So FOB origin and destination seem to be used exclusively in North America, from what I understood 'FOB origin' is the same as FOB in global trading, while 'FOB destination' is pretty much like CIF but risk and title transfer at destination

- You're right about DAP, the buyer is responsible for clearing the goods for import, as opposed to DDP

If you want to know everything there is to know about Incoterms, I suggest you buy their book

 

A aut voluptate ut doloremque iure eos nihil molestiae. Commodi sed in cumque mollitia sit aut. Dolor perferendis porro cupiditate quia quis.

Et adipisci et occaecati dicta praesentium ab dolorem. Quis ut harum numquam neque rerum fuga saepe. Tenetur voluptas dolorem autem veritatis veritatis dignissimos eos. Aut cumque atque dolor velit fugit quisquam. Ut corrupti quia alias aut perferendis excepturi rem. Sit eveniet officiis suscipit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”