Insider Trading - Monster Case to Double Prosecutions Since 2009

Happy to see Gordon Gekko on the front page of the Journal today. He is now part of a PSA put on by the FBI to discourage insider trading. The 120 person case that is being compiled and could be expanded to 240, is by far the largest in history.

The most astonishing part to me, ONLY 66 PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH INSIDER TRADING SINCE 2009??!?! They really must only go elephant hunting. I am no lawyer but you must just have to build an iron clad case to get people convicted on this stuff. Only 57 of the 66 were convicted or plead guilty.

Someone help me out here. Am I reading this too literally or are there really such a limited number of cases.

From: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203…

9 Comments
 
Best Response

Because they dont allow wires on golf courses.

Even if I'm best friends with the CEO of Megacorp. Inc. and he knows what his stats are and tells me them, to prove a conversation took place where I obtained insider information is particularly difficult. You either need phone transcripts or email logs, and anyone dumb enough to leave those lying around is either negligent, naive or innocent.

Even if I book a flight to go to Tokyo have dinner with the CEO of company A, spend lots of money on him and buy him a car. Then fly home and short his stock to the ground, they need to prove he told me his results.

They should do what they do for companies in whistleblowing. Give the blower immunity, and allow them to take X% of the profits. With noone trusting anyone else, it would put the practise out of business pretty fast. Not to mention massively rearrange the top performers of the financial world.

Ask any relatively pretty and smart girl who talks to finance types. They openly admit to it in their bravado speeches.

 

nm

If your dreams don't scare you, then they are not big enough. "There are two types of people in this world: People who say they pee in the shower, and dirty fucking liars."-Louis C.K.
 

You could also be looking at literal numbers of insider trading which would be artificially low. That could still mean that there were other "peripheral" cases that resulted in other charges. For example, Martha Stewart didn't go to jail for insider trading, she went to jail for obstruction of justice for deleting any references to meetings with Waksal on her old calendars. I think she also made verbal lies to investigators, but can't recall at the moment.

So it's possible that there's people that were charged with insider trading but ultimately convicted of something else.

 

Those plea bargain stats might be difficult to find, like company infractions a lot of this things are handled on the hush with no official admitting of guilt. I think the idea of elephant hunting is also pretty relevant. The resources to track down a joe shmoe insider case versus a hundred million dollar insider case would be essentially the same. Regulators need returns on their investments like everyone else, its just measured through convictions rates weighted with case sizes. Just like with other criminal activities, I don't think a DA is boosting his reputation by nailing thieves guilty of $50 Larceny.

 

Accusantium et modi reprehenderit est voluptas inventore quis iure. Voluptatem velit minus quasi id iste enim sit. Dolor cumque ut alias voluptatem mollitia ut voluptas. Repellendus sequi ea nemo qui magnam nobis magni.

Totam non corrupti voluptates sit ducimus qui tenetur. Saepe quia rerum soluta qui. Perspiciatis ut consequuntur et blanditiis rem aliquam saepe. Error tempore laboriosam ipsam voluptatem itaque magni. Pariatur qui perferendis molestiae et est. Occaecati ipsa ut fugit officiis itaque non qui cum.

At alias voluptatem in. Nemo est deleniti dolorem ipsa est quam. Quae necessitatibus inventore provident nulla officia sint. Eius sunt velit et nulla aut facere culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”