More optimistic about long-term S&T career after blowout quarter?

I know, I know... Q2 was an anomaly, pandemic-related, not gonna happen again. That said, because GS/MS/JPM had such unbelievable trading quarters, do you think this reverses the trend of reduction in headcount in S&T? It just seems so important to these banks, roughly 30-40% of overall revenue... is there a chance headcount EXPANDS due to the clients' obviously heavy reliance on trading, during both good times and bad?

9 Comments
 

no, unlike IB which has had to recruit like crazy the last few yers to capture growing fees (human bots to churn out decks), S&T desks were plenty staffed during the last quarter - in fact prolly couldve achieved same pnl with even fewer people, esp in sales.

 

What about FT offers for SA people? I know we’ll find out soon enough, but do you think the massive revenue generated this year will encourage BBs to increase their FT offers to SAs?

 
Most Helpful

Not really. If anything, this crisis has shown that:

1) Even with less headcount from cost cutting the last 5-10 years, traders can still perform well during the crisis and capture PnL. Why would there be an incentive to hire more if we have proven that more people doesn't necessarily equate to more PnL?

2) Given that most banks have 70-80% of their staff wfh (and have proven that this business can be done whilst at home rather than being on the trading floor), this proves that there doesn't need to be such strong investments in trading floor infrastructure e.g. turrets, advanced computers, having tech teams on standby etc etc

3) For very liquid asset classes like FX, Equities and Rates, the crisis was a great opportunity for banks to test how their electronic platforms perform during a blowup. From the feedback i've seen in my product, 80% of the platform bid/offer was listed as similar to manual traders set width and skew. Tells you all you need re future of automation etc.

Given that most banks (especially European ones) still need to cut costs, if i was a bank CEO, S&T looks like a very good place to do so.....

 

But what about the BBs here -- you think they'd be reluctant to reduce head count since they might not want to risk that they can't service clients during times of volatility and heavy demand, which we just saw?

 

Well not really, banks still need to cut costs at the end of the day (take a look at DB and HSBC being the two most obvious ones). Evidence has shown that even with less headcount in S&T, the division is still able to perform well during a downturn. Once vols normalise (as they will continue to do), margins decrease and we go back to normal.

Again, if i was a bank CEO, automation trend is obvious 1) and 2) 80% of my S&T workforce is wfh and business is getting run fine, so why do i need to put so much investments on all this trading floor infrastructure? Why should i not just continue to cut headcount?

 

But why is it assumed that cutting headcount will not cut down on efficiency? I get that they may want to simply maintain headcount... but no fear that cutting headcount will hurt servicing the client? I guess if it does, they can just hire back up again.

 

Consequatur doloremque ut unde error similique sit. Porro similique vero est assumenda. Magnam quibusdam molestiae mollitia sequi sit. Aut itaque quia adipisci quae ex alias.

Nemo nam nulla deleniti rem sint eligendi quos. Nihil in quo blanditiis quia ut iure voluptatem. Molestias assumenda tenetur at voluptas quibusdam unde. Quia et minus atque et laborum voluptates suscipit. Inventore eligendi quia dignissimos quibusdam sed excepturi. Aut sit molestias corporis ipsa earum nobis cum. Dolor amet consectetur et repudiandae.

Asperiores eum omnis voluptas sunt distinctio voluptatibus. Dolorem doloremque temporibus illum quos animi assumenda. Eaque soluta sit numquam aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”