Quantitative trading/research - fixed income vs commodities

Hi,

I am looking for some advice/opinion to guide me on a decision with regards to my next role. I am going to move jobs and I currently have two offers, both in global macro quantitative research. One offer is within commodities (term structure modelling) and the other is within fixed income (yield curve modelling). I'd be very interested to hear your advice for what direction you would go in. I have experience in both fields - I've spent 5 years in major CTAs and I've spent the last 3 years in fixed income quant research at a bank.

The guy heading the commodities team at the new role seamed very knowledgeable in commodities so I'll have a mentor to guide me. The guy heading the fixed income is a bit of a generalist and doesn't have deep fixed income knowledge but the firm has a lot of fixed income expertise and it seems I'll find support from someone if I need it.

Personally, I am currently leaning towards the Fixed Income yield curve modelling role. The biggest reason probably is the current environment - the yield curve has become the hottest topic in finance and the next few years might be interesting. The same can be said for commodities though but I am put off by the field because when I worked in CTAs, research was quite boring. Unfortunately, I don't have experience in Fixed Income trading which might be equally or even more boring than commodities? I've also not come across many quant funds that do quantitative fixed income.

One worry, however, that I have is that the fixed income markets are far more distributed/fragmented, far less standardized, far higher proportion is voice rather than electronic trading. This might become a nightmare for doing quantitative research and might be a killer for trading. Whereas with commodities, I know my way around, I know the data, I know where to get it, how to process it etc, with fixed income, I am far less experienced. But then again, the fact that fixed income is hard to trade quantitatively can also be a positive - less competition, more alpha.

Any thoughts would be very welcome and appreciated.

1 Comments
 

Consequatur neque nisi commodi officia ad consequatur voluptates. In et voluptatum doloribus quae et recusandae. Velit est enim molestias ipsa fuga reiciendis esse. Qui ab et tempore ipsum veritatis. Rerum voluptatem autem omnis in quis quia quos. Consequatur optio aut ex facilis et qui.

Iure tenetur alias et nisi quibusdam occaecati et. Dicta debitis sunt in iste consequatur. Non quibusdam repudiandae omnis pariatur. Explicabo recusandae repellendus sapiente quaerat quasi consectetur omnis. Accusantium inventore quo neque animi sed mollitia. Aut omnis sunt explicabo deleniti esse ut sequi.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”