Quantitative trading/research - fixed income vs commodities

Hi,

I am looking for some advice/opinion to guide me on a decision with regards to my next role. I am going to move jobs and I currently have two offers, both in global macro quantitative research. One offer is within commodities (term structure modelling) and the other is within fixed income (yield curve modelling). I'd be very interested to hear your advice for what direction you would go in. I have experience in both fields - I've spent 5 years in major CTAs and I've spent the last 3 years in fixed income quant research at a bank.

The guy heading the commodities team at the new role seamed very knowledgeable in commodities so I'll have a mentor to guide me. The guy heading the fixed income is a bit of a generalist and doesn't have deep fixed income knowledge but the firm has a lot of fixed income expertise and it seems I'll find support from someone if I need it.

Personally, I am currently leaning towards the Fixed Income yield curve modelling role. The biggest reason probably is the current environment - the yield curve has become the hottest topic in finance and the next few years might be interesting. The same can be said for commodities though but I am put off by the field because when I worked in CTAs, research was quite boring. Unfortunately, I don't have experience in Fixed Income trading which might be equally or even more boring than commodities? I've also not come across many quant funds that do quantitative fixed income.

One worry, however, that I have is that the fixed income markets are far more distributed/fragmented, far less standardized, far higher proportion is voice rather than electronic trading. This might become a nightmare for doing quantitative research and might be a killer for trading. Whereas with commodities, I know my way around, I know the data, I know where to get it, how to process it etc, with fixed income, I am far less experienced. But then again, the fact that fixed income is hard to trade quantitatively can also be a positive - less competition, more alpha.

Any thoughts would be very welcome and appreciated.

 

Hic necessitatibus ipsa neque assumenda. Perspiciatis quaerat pariatur voluptatem illo sint asperiores. Repudiandae dicta quae et error ad.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”