lol, it depends. For example:

If you buy a Call Option on a stock/currency, you are long gamma and long delta, so if spot moves 1% UP, then your PnL will go up. Conversely, a 1% drop in spot will decrease your PnL.

Naturally it's the opposite for a put option.

I'm being facetious here, but make your question a little more specific and we'll come back with a clearer answer.

(I'm anticipating your next response and have already prepared the answer, but nevertheless, rephrase it lol)

 

Let's assume you're long gamma on a call. How do you arrive at a specific P&L with that though?

I know the P&L will go up. What I am interested in knowing is whether you can determine the P&L without knowing the delta?

Would appreciate some clarifications on that. Cheers.

 
Best Response

No you cannot. Remember that delta is what determines the (change in position value with each move in spot)

So for example: On a call option, if it has a delta of 0.5 and a gamma of 0.1 and spot is at 100.

At that instant, we understand that if spot goes to 101 (an increase of $1), your position increases by $0.50. But we note that on the way from 100 to 101, gamma was moving the delta from 0.5 to 0.6. So your PnL is actually somewhere between $0.50 and $0.60 depending on how fast your gamma is moving (volgamma/vomma).

However if the call option had a delta of 0.2 and the same gamma of 0.1 and spot at 100, your PnL increase for a move from 100 to 101 would actually be somewhere between $0.2 and $0.3.

So as you can see, the gamma was the same in both the 50 delta and 20 delta call option, but the PnL was completely different.

Conclusion: gamma doesn't determine your exact PnL, it just determines how fast your PnL (in concrete terms) will change. You will need that delta figure.

Hope that helps.

 

"What I am interested in knowing is whether you can determine the P&L without knowing the delta?"

no, it's like saying "i'm in a car accelerating 10 miles per hour, how fast am I going."

But honestly, getting a proper handle on your gamma, and how it buckets out is not the easiest thing in the world. I used to use the old "how much is my pnl mispredicted by" method. works like a charm.

 

Thanks guys.

As a matter of fact, I perfectly understand what FXTrader is trying to illustrate. The problem isn't so much about the mathematical theory, but rather the lingo being used and understanding it in its relevant context. Maybe I wasn't being concise at the start.

Coming from where I come from (non-FX), I have never actually heard anyone use the term "long X gamma" on my desk. Hence, I am trying to clarify what that really translates to.

 

It's just a risk management measure, so on this FX desk, when Trader A says to Trader B, "I need to move some inventory off this book, what's ur gamma?" Trader B responds, "heavy! I'm long X gamma!" More often than not, all Trader A is trying to determine is how trader B is positioned, so he can determine how much risk he can offset with him.

Remember, for the most part these guys want to maintain low gamma, low delta, low vega (unless its a prop trade). So they refer to these measures to give each other an idea of which direction they should move their inventory in order to stay flat.

So in the example above with Trader A and Trader B, Trader A is clearly not going to sell options to Trader B, because Trader B would be buying them and getting LONGER gamma.

That conversation will probably end with Trader A saying: "Ok fuck it, thanks"

Fair enough?

 

Vitae dolorem architecto perferendis rem. Voluptatem autem eos velit.

Est non modi voluptatem dolores ut autem. Incidunt hic minus qui et placeat non nisi. Magni quos sunt molestiae debitis qui et. Quaerat ipsa fuga porro. Harum quia amet totam laudantium ea fuga atque. Dolores quo omnis dignissimos quae at dolores.

Enim libero sint exercitationem ut. Non asperiores consequatur velit numquam laudantium voluptas beatae.

Perspiciatis architecto sapiente deleniti. Ea cupiditate rerum saepe voluptatum odio et officiis. Eligendi quis minima est quia nihil ipsa. Dolorem asperiores fuga dicta molestiae et. Qui aut aut sint aliquid perferendis corrupti harum cumque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”