Turtle trading

I recently came across the story of the "turtle traders." The system they use seems like a lot of horseshit. Has anyone used, or know anyone that has used the system and been successful? Here is the story for anyone who doesn't know. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/08/turtle-trading.asp

11 Comments
 

I'm not a trader but after reading the article it sounds like, as you put it, a lot of horseshit.

Maybe people with more knowledge of technical trading can explain but it sounds like he's just trying to buy when the market is going up and selling as soon as it hints of dropping. But isn't this a worthless piece of advice? The difficulty is knowing WHEN it will "breakout" and even the article admits that most commonly it's just a false "breakout" resulting in losses.

Either way, thanks for sharing that article, interesting read.

 
Best Response

Yes, the story of the turtle traders is basically all about people having trouble sticking to strict rules. The people with backgrounds from Wall Street had the most trouble watching their accounts dwindle. I believe the longest stretch of losing days was two years.

What's important to note is that modern science has shown us that stress caused by small but consistent losses actually damages the human brain after a while. Traders were literally DYING in to follow the turtle rules in bad times which is one of the reasons, people broke the rules and were kicked out of the program. That's why the system works, most traders just can't stand the losses so it's basically a behavioral finance anomaly.

Horseshit it ain't, because it worked in the times it was implemented. All the traders that stuck to the rules got rich and a few of them started their own firms. But today, the markets have fewer consistent anomalies and you require huge sums of money to trade the way these guys did, so you need to work for a large institution.

 

As stated the system followed some very strong risk controls. The reason the system does not work today IS BECAUSE there are too many false breakouts. Back in the 70's and 80's when this system was implemented, the market was less sophisticated and there was not all the algo and HF running around. If a stock broke resistance or support levels there was a good chance that you could see a nice little run.

"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
 

The turtle system was a simple system that played breakouts and used wide stops to stay in winning trades and try to catch big trends. These systems work sometimes and other times they do not...in trendless markets they get chopped up but they usually catch big moves and therefore trend-followers killed it during the subprime crisis. John Henry's CTAs and other funds that are "systematic trend followers" tend to use systems that are similar to the turtles but with a few more bells and whistles made possible by easier programing now then there was in the 1980s.

I personally am not a systematic trader but i do watch "breakouts" (new highs or new lows) and will often try to play them if the fundamentals behind the trade make sense.

 

One of the turtles came and spoke to a class i was in last year. He seemed like he was doing pretty damn well and his wife was a knockout. Basically he stressed risk management.

 

Tempora quia labore dolorem qui error rem. Sit nesciunt eaque provident eum. Pariatur sed est ab. Nemo quia quis doloribus temporibus beatae aut. Beatae reprehenderit odit recusandae iure.

Aliquid autem deleniti aspernatur velit sunt laboriosam eos. Id repellendus saepe numquam sit sint fugiat ea. Et dicta autem reiciendis nihil beatae est eaque.

Hic adipisci quidem et et ut ut aut expedita. Neque non distinctio ut provident quo ut. Nesciunt corporis suscipit eius soluta sed. Quas suscipit voluptas sequi est quia aut dolore. Laborum velit id et laboriosam voluptates dolorem facere. Dolorem non dolores ex numquam.

Enim eaque amet et provident ab quia. Voluptates sunt rerum est aut. Molestias voluptas illum quod facere qui quas. Velit quam provident possimus velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”