Volatility Trading Environment

Pretty curious about how folks are trading vol as someone who does not really do it/doesn't know much about it. It seems like in the past weeks it's hard to pick a side on the trade, i.e. being short or long vol. Post-event vol crush with all the tariff back and forth seems like a time to sell vol, but there are so many external catalysts rn that probably distort dealer activity and flows. I thought, maybe it could be worth selling 0-1 DTE straddles and going long a straddle dated a week or so ahead to harvest gamma, but in the moment you're effectively short gamma and long theta so you're paying to NOT own convexity from my understanding, any color?

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your observation about the challenges in trading volatility in the current environment is spot on. Volatility trading, especially in uncertain times with multiple external catalysts, requires a nuanced approach. Here's some insight:

  1. Post-Event Vol Crush: Selling volatility after an event (like tariff announcements) can be tempting due to the expected vol crush. However, as you noted, external catalysts can distort dealer activity and flows, making it riskier than usual. Dealers might hedge differently, and unexpected news can reignite volatility.

  2. 0-1 DTE Straddles vs. Longer-Dated Straddles: Your idea of selling 0-1 DTE straddles while going long a straddle dated a week ahead is an interesting gamma harvesting strategy. However, as you correctly pointed out, this setup makes you:

    • Short Gamma: This means you're exposed to sharp moves in the underlying, which can lead to losses if the market moves significantly in either direction.
    • Long Theta: You're earning time decay on the short-dated straddles, but you're also paying for the longer-dated straddle's theta.

    The key issue here is that you're effectively paying to avoid owning convexity. If the market experiences a sharp move, the short gamma exposure can outweigh the benefits of the theta you're collecting. This strategy works best in a range-bound market with low realized volatility, but in a catalyst-heavy environment, it can be risky.

  3. External Catalysts and Dealer Flows: The presence of multiple catalysts (e.g., geopolitical events, economic data releases) can lead to unpredictable dealer flows. Dealers might hedge their positions dynamically, which can amplify market moves and make it harder to predict vol behavior.

  4. Alternative Approaches:

    • Calendar Spreads: Instead of outright short gamma, consider calendar spreads where you sell near-dated options and buy longer-dated options. This can help you benefit from the vol term structure while reducing some of the risks associated with being short gamma.
    • Tail Risk Hedging: If you're concerned about sharp moves, consider incorporating deep out-of-the-money options to hedge against tail risks. This can provide some protection while allowing you to maintain your core strategy.

In summary, while your strategy has merit in certain conditions, the current environment with high external catalysts might require a more cautious approach. Adjusting for tail risks and considering alternative structures like calendar spreads could help balance the risk-reward profile.

Sources: Trading Ideas: Matter of Edge, Difficulty Check, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/sales-trading-interview-guide-gekkos-guidance-part-2?customgpt=1, A Decade Into IB: Teetering on the Edge of Cataclysm?, Sales & Trading Interview Guide - Gekko's Guidance Part 2

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Dolore vel voluptas explicabo. Enim architecto ut error dolores a. Ut asperiores quia delectus iste veritatis facilis reiciendis.

Ipsam ducimus iure recusandae numquam nobis. Odio sequi magni est nobis quas. Quibusdam reiciendis est rerum id ipsum. Fugiat nihil esse in blanditiis.

Quibusdam illum non tempora enim et corporis. Et voluptate eos deserunt hic dolore dolore. Eos consequatur aperiam facere aliquam repellendus animi. Non aliquid aspernatur blanditiis fuga facilis laboriosam.

Voluptate voluptatem voluptas voluptatibus minus. Deserunt esse aut excepturi nihil est. Rerum maxime labore sunt ad praesentium quis ea. Dicta molestiae mollitia sapiente in error quis. Cupiditate dolor totam quisquam ratione tenetur minima.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”