Transition VC -> GE,

Not in a top notch VC but definitely got a taste of the industry. I've been doing this for 1.5y and realised later stage deals is more of interest for me. I thought it was easier to make the move (having an investor background) but finding it quite tough. Is there anyone who followed this path (as opposed to the traditional IB/ Consulting rute) that would be willing to share his/her experience?

 

9 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It's a tricky market right now, a lot of funds are hurting since the 2022 bloodbath. Early stage funds have a bit more latitude as valuations haven't corrected as hard and while fund sizes are shrinking and time between raises is increasing, there's still some appetite to hire junior talent. On the later stage side of things, it's pretty silent, nobody wants to catch falling knives, and most are waiting for a price correction since having the conversation is something nobody wants to do. A lot of tourists have left, and many growth teams are waiting it out until IPO markets reopen hopefully by Q1 next year.

As someone that has worked in early stage and now later stage VC, I do want to say they are different skillsets and sourcing and diligence looks a bit different as well. Your best bet in this industry is to get a referral, so I would focus your effort on networking, and see if you can add some follow-on investment deals on your track record in the meanwhile, so at least you can say you touched some later stage rounds and have seen the materials etc. 1.5 years of experience is great, but it's still early to really sell your experience, would recommend at least another year on the job so you can at least have a few meaningful deals and maybe an exit.

Hootie
 

Also have a few questions here: for those already in VC, how pivotal is the brand of VC in terms of exit ops to 'better-brand VCs' or Growth Equity. Wondering how hard it is to move from a starter-VC with a few top investments (maybe 2-3/20 are unicorns) but not a well-known brand name? Does the portfolio mean more than the brand itself, or do brands just hire brands in VC?

Also I guess a no-name VC brand would struggle to move to a good GE firm; curious to hear thoughts here also

 

Generally, moving up the funnel (i.e., from early-stage VC to Growth) is more difficult than moving down the funnel (i.e., from PE/IB to Growth). This, whether right or wrong, is largely based on technical abilities. At an early-stage shop, sector-specific knowledge, sourcing and building conviction on a management team are more important. Series B+, where there is some traction and prospects have demonstrated PMF, performance-related analysis is more prevalent and often more associated with more analytical backgrounds/experience - e.g., as with PE and IB. At the later stage, being able to build out a complex operating forecast/revenue build (sometimes driven by unit economics/cohort analysis) is more important, so if you can demonstrate/work on those skills then it'll make things easier. That being said, as a general rule: I'd assume that the further up the funnel you go (i.e., the later the stage of investing), the greater the requirement for a traditional, analytical background (PE/IB). Nothing is ever impossible - my suggestions would be to get as much exposure to follow-on rounds as possible.

 

Dolor iste id omnis nemo. Omnis et minus accusantium animi autem repudiandae. Sit accusamus provident autem eaque a officiis voluptatem. Non saepe accusamus minus dolor odio dolorum. Laboriosam iusto vitae fuga quidem ut maxime.

Enim quo sunt odit neque corrupti similique. Quia beatae libero amet aut atque commodi consequatur magnam. Alias cupiditate ipsum fugiat corrupti animi eveniet. Temporibus esse sit quisquam nostrum nam cumque. Accusamus sint ullam quam temporibus in provident. Magnam eius aut laudantium quas reiciendis et.

Ex quod et doloremque cupiditate veritatis minus et. Ratione sit natus delectus quis animi. Nobis cupiditate architecto illum omnis sed. Sed sed ab dolorum.

Sunt ut veritatis assumenda. Illum dicta quia sapiente nulla sunt. Tenetur aut cum sint nihil id praesentium. Sed et maiores repellat et expedita qui. Vel fugit voluptas unde ut quos fugit a alias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”