VC > LO AM/MF

After 3 years of VC, I’m considering moving back into publics by joining a ~$50B LO AM/MF (currently in late stage in interview process; firm is well respected across the Street) (prior experience in SS ER; ~6-7 years post-grad). My current/prior experience is centered around a high growth sector (think: tech, healthcare), and the new role is aligned with this experience. 

What are the pros/cons of making this transition from VC > LO AM? I of course understand the daily MTM piece, but trying to think beyond that. Current shop I’m at is increasingly focused on portco management vs. new deals, which is limiting my front-end experience. Thinking through things like deal velocity, workload, WLB/QoL, comp, upside potential, etc.

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key considerations for transitioning from VC to LO AM/MF:

Pros:

  1. Deal Velocity: LO AM typically offers higher deal velocity compared to VC. You'll likely analyze more opportunities and make more frequent investment decisions, which can be intellectually stimulating and help refine your investment acumen.
  2. Sector Alignment: Since the new role aligns with your high-growth sector expertise (e.g., tech, healthcare), you can leverage your existing knowledge while expanding your skill set in public markets.
  3. Work-Life Balance (WLB): LO AM generally provides better WLB compared to VC, especially if your current shop is heavily focused on portco management. The day-to-day in LO AM is less operationally intensive.
  4. Compensation Stability: LO AM roles often come with more stable compensation structures (base + bonus) compared to the carry-heavy, long-term payout model in VC.
  5. Upside Potential: While VC offers carry, LO AM can provide upside through performance-based bonuses and, in some cases, profit-sharing or equity in the firm.

Cons:

  1. Daily MTM (Mark-to-Market): As you mentioned, the public markets' daily MTM can be a psychological adjustment, especially if you're used to the longer-term focus of VC.
  2. Workload: While WLB may improve, the workload in LO AM can still be intense, especially during earnings seasons or when managing large portfolios.
  3. Upside Limitation: The upside in LO AM may not match the potential carry in VC, especially if you're at a successful fund. However, this depends on the firm's structure and your role.
  4. Cultural Shift: Moving from the entrepreneurial, hands-on environment of VC to the more structured, research-driven culture of LO AM may require an adjustment.
  5. Focus on Public Markets: If you enjoy the operational and strategic aspects of VC, you might miss the direct involvement with portfolio companies in LO AM.

Additional Considerations:

  • Quality of Life: LO AM tends to have a more predictable schedule compared to the often chaotic nature of VC, especially in firms focused on portco management.
  • Skill Development: Transitioning to LO AM will enhance your public markets expertise, which could be valuable if you ever consider moving to a hedge fund or other public markets roles in the future.

Ultimately, the decision depends on your long-term career goals. If you're looking for a more stable, research-focused role with better WLB and alignment with your sector expertise, LO AM could be a great fit. However, if you value the entrepreneurial and operational aspects of VC, you might want to weigh the trade-offs carefully.

Sources: AM vs HF: The Business of Our Business, Let's Talk About the Pros and Cons of our Gigs in RE Finance, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/lets-talk-about-the-pros-and-cons-of-our-gigs-in-re-finance?customgpt=1, L/S vs LO from a non-monetary perspective, M&A Pros and Cons

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Interesting background. We may have to chat since I think we’ll have a lot in common.

I think the key pros/cons are exactly what you’d expect and there’s not too much nuance broadly speaking. Unfortunately, it’s going to simply come down to what type of lifestyle/responsibilities you’d prefer.

I will share what I know about AM (not enough VC experience yet)

Lifestyle/QoL:
- AM and VC are probably fairly comparable
- AM will have very predictable hours dictated by the market with the heavy hours coming from earnings seasons. Expect range of 45-60 with average probably around 50

Comp:
- VC definitely has more upside and higher ceiling with equity/carry
- Average outcomes likely favor AM. Risk-averse/frictionless path to mid-to-high 6 figures with low 7 figure if you make PM

Responsibilities/Type of Work:
- This is where you get the biggest difference
- AM is far less hands on with investment opportunities (obviously) but you also have a lot more freedom to use your time however you see fit. You basically have total autonomy over your day to day but you better use it wisely otherwise you’ll likely fall behind since there’s so much you could be doing depending on mandate/strategy
- VC and AM actually have a shared philosophy in determining market sizing, share changes over a multi-year period, business quality, moats, etc.
- The AM investment process usually leans more qualitative than quantitative. The quantitative aspects come from understanding valuation, entry/exit points, ROIC changes, and investment cycles.
- This transition makes way more sense than VC to pod-shop where it’s much more granular modeling and incremental financials/valuation

 

Eveniet nemo itaque quibusdam accusantium asperiores rerum qui. Ullam architecto quia eius minus at voluptas alias. Aut voluptates aperiam omnis voluptates est possimus et error. Et consequatur corporis tenetur quam dolorem.

Omnis optio dolor ipsa dolorem error eum optio. Minus perspiciatis id et voluptatem neque et nobis. Aut nesciunt qui omnis voluptatem consequatur et. Possimus laboriosam consequuntur quod blanditiis.

Magni aut alias voluptatibus ut et. Laudantium voluptate libero saepe deserunt in a atque praesentium. Fugit culpa architecto maiores aperiam ducimus ea.

Ut aliquam rerum occaecati quod. Numquam repellendus harum officiis. Et repellat neque neque accusantium provident.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”