Venture Capital: Data Driven vs Traditional Strategies

The top venture capitalist of this age gets paid the big bucks because they claim they have a special eye for the billion dollar companies. They claim that they are able to identify early the best companies based on markets, team, product, trend or whatever it might be. This is that "gut" feeling. But that's the exact reason that traditional venture capitalists have failed to return good returns and that Venture capital as an asset class generally does not fare well against the market.

But what happen if we take a data-driven approach to venture capital?

So far I can think of a few firms that do this. Correlation VC, 500 Startups, Google ventures. Correlation VC actually takes historical data and invests based off of that. PAVS invests along the same lines. 500 startups involves both a quant and traditional approach in that they make smaller bets based off of gut instinct at the earliest stages.

Dave McClure of 500 startups had argued that due to low cost of startups these days, it's now possible to try to aim for larger number of base hit companies rather than that home run company. Steve Blank also argued that following a more data driven approach will statistically result in the success rate of raising capital and succeeding.

With the wealth of venture capital firms out there today, what strategy will represent the future of Venture Capital? Would love to hear some thoughts from VC industry people here.

4 Comments
 
Best Response

Interesting post. I would echo what mb666 mentioned about the black swan events. The challenge and danger of using historical data to predict future performance is that we often forget to take into consideration the risk involved. Just as there can be upside to blackswan events, there can be large downsides, and more often than not, relying on historical data tends to hide those risks creating false sense of security. Very difficult to draw causative links between historical data and future performance. (Check out Nassim Taleb's writing on the topic)

VC all seems about the management of great teams. When working at such an early stage, having the right people in place often trumps the great idea. The ideas often change multiple times before the company becomes successful. Experimenting and learning quickly from you mistakes requires a great team, and I don't think historical data can help guide that decision.

The error of confirmation: we confirm our knowledge and scorn our ignorance.
 

I’ve spoken with both Correlation (Anu P.) and GV (Tyson C.) on their quantitative strategies. GV intrigues me most as it is what I try to use. According to related models I have seen, their take has more to do with systems theory and taking individual transaction data and developing a sensitivity analysis around it. Monte Carlo is used as well in some cases to discover mean scenario in a frequency distribution. Correlation’s take is proprietary according to those I’ve spoken with. But I have a hard time understanding their data sources for the predictive analytics that guides their decisions.

 

Sapiente aspernatur sit atque consequuntur praesentium. Et enim aliquid est deserunt molestiae nam mollitia explicabo. Nisi unde aut sapiente voluptas totam eius. Accusantium est quod voluptas eos. Porro veritatis consequatur rerum enim nesciunt unde.

Placeat animi vel quibusdam reiciendis voluptatibus. Similique odit fugit incidunt ut dolor dolore vitae. Pariatur ut accusantium sed sunt et soluta. Aliquam dolor et voluptatem voluptatem. Doloremque rerum nobis mollitia vel reprehenderit.

Non beatae labore enim sit facere. Qui voluptatem et minima dicta quia cumque rerum. Voluptatem iure minima dolorum impedit ut et.

Porro rem dolore quas rem inventore. Est hic labore alias et est voluptas saepe. In aut eum incidunt amet animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”